IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/qualqt/v26y1992i2p147-155.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

In search of one set of categories

Author

Listed:
  • Roel Popping

Abstract

No abstract is available for this item.

Suggested Citation

  • Roel Popping, 1992. "In search of one set of categories," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 26(2), pages 147-155, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:qualqt:v:26:y:1992:i:2:p:147-155
    DOI: 10.1007/BF02273550
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1007/BF02273550
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/BF02273550?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Roel Popping, 1983. "Traces of agreement: On the DOT-product as a coefficient of agreement," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 17(1), pages 1-18, February.
    2. Lea Scherl & Michael Smithson, 1987. "A new dimension to content analysis: Exploring relationships among thematic categories," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 21(2), pages 199-208, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Roel Popping, 2007. "Text Analysis for Knowledge Graphs," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 41(5), pages 691-709, October.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Allison Kaufman & Erin Colbert-White & Robert Rosenthal, 2014. "A novel rater agreement methodology for language transcriptions: evidence from a nonhuman speaker," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 48(4), pages 2329-2339, July.
    2. Popping, Roel, 1996. "More agreeable software," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 22(5), pages 561-567, September.
    3. Thomas Jacobson & Wenjie Yan, 1998. "Q-Analysis Techniques for Studying Communication Content," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 32(1), pages 93-108, February.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:qualqt:v:26:y:1992:i:2:p:147-155. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.