IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/pubtra/v11y2019i3d10.1007_s12469-019-00213-0.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Modeling passengers’ perceptions of intercity train service quality for regular and special days

Author

Listed:
  • Md. Hadiuzzaman

    (Bangladesh University of Engineering and Technology)

  • D. M. Ghius Malik

    (Bangladesh University of Engineering and Technology)

  • Saurav Barua

    (Daffodil International University)

  • Tony Z. Qiu

    (University of Alberta)

  • Amy Kim

    (University of Alberta)

Abstract

The Adaptive Neuro-Fuzzy Inference System (ANFIS) is used in this study to model the non-linear relationship between intercity train service quality (SQ) and its attributes related to physical conditions and service features. We use Likert scale questionnaire survey data from 1037 and 553 users to calibrate the ANFIS structures for intercity train SQ estimation for regular days and special days, respectively. The influences of membership functions (MFs) and epochs on ANFIS performance are assessed to capture heterogeneity in the collected SQ data. Based on this study, it is found that the effect of epochs is insignificant for a higher number of epochs. Moreover, the Gaussian-type MF incorporated into the ANFIS structure fits the collected survey data better than other distributions. Overall, the proposed ANFIS structures with 18 attributes show 54.1% and 60.2% accuracy in predicting train SQ for regular days and special days, respectively. A stepwise approach is followed for ranking the intercity train SQ attributes influencing its overall SQ and the results are compared with those of the empirical observations (public opinions). The study implies that besides waiting place condition, attributes related to physical conditions and service features of intercity train are important determinants of its perceived SQ for regular days and special days, respectively. These results help in identifying the characteristics that are important to SQ perception. This can help transit planners and managers in targeting improvement investments that will be most effective to help commuters think more positively about their trips.

Suggested Citation

  • Md. Hadiuzzaman & D. M. Ghius Malik & Saurav Barua & Tony Z. Qiu & Amy Kim, 2019. "Modeling passengers’ perceptions of intercity train service quality for regular and special days," Public Transport, Springer, vol. 11(3), pages 549-576, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:pubtra:v:11:y:2019:i:3:d:10.1007_s12469-019-00213-0
    DOI: 10.1007/s12469-019-00213-0
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s12469-019-00213-0
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s12469-019-00213-0?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Nathanail, Eftihia, 2008. "Measuring the quality of service for passengers on the hellenic railways," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 42(1), pages 48-66, January.
    2. Chou, Jui-Sheng & Kim, Changwan & Kuo, Yao-Chen & Ou, Nai-Chi, 2011. "Deploying effective service strategy in the operations stage of high-speed rail," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 47(4), pages 507-519, July.
    3. Aydin, Nezir & Celik, Erkan & Gumus, Alev Taskin, 2015. "A hierarchical customer satisfaction framework for evaluating rail transit systems of Istanbul," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 61-81.
    4. Brons, Martijn & Givoni, Moshe & Rietveld, Piet, 2009. "Access to railway stations and its potential in increasing rail use," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 43(2), pages 136-149, February.
    5. Wardman, Mark, 2004. "Public transport values of time," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 11(4), pages 363-377, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Nikita Moiseev & Alexey Mikhaylov & Igor Varyash & Abdul Saqib, 2020. "Investigating the relation of GDP per capita and corruption index," Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues, VsI Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Center, vol. 8(1), pages 780-794, September.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Roberto Sañudo & Eneko Echaniz & Borja Alonso & Rubén Cordera, 2019. "Addressing the Importance of Service Attributes in Railways," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(12), pages 1-20, June.
    2. Aydin, Nezir, 2017. "A fuzzy-based multi-dimensional and multi-period service quality evaluation outline for rail transit systems," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 55(C), pages 87-98.
    3. Díez-Mesa, Francisco & de Oña, Rocio & de Oña, Juan, 2018. "Bayesian networks and structural equation modelling to develop service quality models: Metro of Seville case study," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 118(C), pages 1-13.
    4. Raky Julio & Andres Monzon & Yusak O. Susilo, 2024. "Identifying key elements for user satisfaction of bike-sharing systems: a combination of direct and indirect evaluations," Transportation, Springer, vol. 51(2), pages 407-438, April.
    5. Mandhani, Jyoti & Nayak, Jogendra Kumar & Parida, Manoranjan, 2020. "Interrelationships among service quality factors of Metro Rail Transit System: An integrated Bayesian networks and PLS-SEM approach," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 140(C), pages 320-336.
    6. Puteri Paramita & Zuduo Zheng & Md Mazharul Haque & Simon Washington & Paul Hyland, 2018. "User satisfaction with train fares: A comparative analysis in five Australian cities," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(6), pages 1-26, June.
    7. Benedetto Barabino & Nicola Aldo Cabras & Claudio Conversano & Alessandro Olivo, 2020. "An Integrated Approach to Select Key Quality Indicators in Transit Services," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 149(3), pages 1045-1080, June.
    8. Yuning Wang & Zhe Zhang & Mengyuan Zhu & Hexian Wang, 2020. "The Impact of Service Quality and Customer Satisfaction on Reuse Intention in Urban Rail Transit in Tianjin, China," SAGE Open, , vol. 10(1), pages 21582440198, January.
    9. Yi-Wen Kuo & Cheng-Hsien Hsieh & Cheng-Min Feng & Wen-Ya Yeh, 2013. "Effects of price promotions on potential consumers of high-speed rail," Transportation Planning and Technology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 36(8), pages 722-738, December.
    10. Mahmood Mahmoodi Nesheli & Avishai (Avi) Ceder & Robin Brissaud, 2017. "Public transport service-quality elements based on real-time operational tactics," Transportation, Springer, vol. 44(5), pages 957-975, September.
    11. Wan, Dan & Kamga, Camille & Liu, Jun & Sugiura, Aaron & Beaton, Eric B., 2016. "Rider perception of a “light” Bus Rapid Transit system - The New York City Select Bus Service," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 49(C), pages 41-55.
    12. Hernandez, Sara & Monzon, Andres & de Oña, Rocío, 2016. "Urban transport interchanges: A methodology for evaluating perceived quality," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 84(C), pages 31-43.
    13. Aydin, Nezir & Celik, Erkan & Gumus, Alev Taskin, 2015. "A hierarchical customer satisfaction framework for evaluating rail transit systems of Istanbul," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 61-81.
    14. Hörcher, Daniel & Tirachini, Alejandro, 2021. "A review of public transport economics," Economics of Transportation, Elsevier, vol. 25(C).
    15. Machado-León, José Luis & de Oña, Rocío & Baouni, Tahar & de Oña, Juan, 2017. "Railway transit services in Algiers: priority improvement actions based on users perceptions," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 53(C), pages 175-185.
    16. Xuemei Fu & Zhicai Juan, 2017. "Drivers of transit service loyalty considering heterogeneity between user segments," Transportation Planning and Technology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 40(5), pages 611-623, July.
    17. Amirali Soltanpour & Mahmoud Mesbah & Meeghat Habibian, 2020. "Customer satisfaction in urban rail: a study on transferability of structural equation models," Public Transport, Springer, vol. 12(1), pages 123-146, March.
    18. Zhang, Chunqin & Liu, Yong & Lu, Weite & Xiao, Guangnian, 2019. "Evaluating passenger satisfaction index based on PLS-SEM model: Evidence from Chinese public transport service," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 120(C), pages 149-164.
    19. Nassereddine, M. & Eskandari, H., 2017. "An integrated MCDM approach to evaluate public transportation systems in Tehran," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 106(C), pages 427-439.
    20. Wang, Binni & Wang, Pong & Tu, Yiliu, 2021. "Customer satisfaction service match and service quality-based blockchain cloud manufacturing," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 240(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:pubtra:v:11:y:2019:i:3:d:10.1007_s12469-019-00213-0. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.