IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/psycho/v89y2024i3d10.1007_s11336-024-09963-8.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Polytomous Effectiveness Indicators in Complex Problem-Solving Tasks and Their Applications in Developing Measurement Model

Author

Listed:
  • Pujue Wang

    (Beijing Normal University
    Beijing Key Laboratory of Applied Experimental Psychology, National Demonstration Center for Experimental Psychology Education (Beijing Normal University))

  • Hongyun Liu

    (Beijing Normal University
    Beijing Key Laboratory of Applied Experimental Psychology, National Demonstration Center for Experimental Psychology Education (Beijing Normal University))

Abstract

Recent years have witnessed the emergence of measurement models for analyzing action sequences in computer-based problem-solving interactive tasks. The cutting-edge psychometrics process models require pre-specification of the effectiveness of state transitions often simplifying them into dichotomous indicators. However, the dichotomous effectiveness becomes impractical when dealing with complex tasks that involve multiple optimal paths and numerous state transitions. Building on the concept of problem-solving, we introduce polytomous indicators to assess the effectiveness of problem states $$d_{s}$$ d s and state-to-state transitions $${\mathrm {\Delta }d}_{\mathrm {s\rightarrow s'}}$$ Δ d s → s ′ . The three-step evaluation method for these two types of indicators is proposed and illustrated across two real problem-solving tasks. We further present a novel psychometrics process model, the sequential response model with polytomous effectiveness indicators (SRM-PEI), which is tailored to encompass a broader range of problem-solving tasks. Monte Carlo simulations indicated that SRM-PEI performed well in the estimation of latent ability and transition tendency parameters across different conditions. Empirical studies conducted on two real tasks supported the better fit of SRM-PEI over previous models such as SRM and SRMM, providing rational and interpretable estimates of latent abilities and transition tendencies through effectiveness indicators. The paper concludes by outlining potential avenues for the further application and enhancement of polytomous effectiveness indicators and SRM-PEI.

Suggested Citation

  • Pujue Wang & Hongyun Liu, 2024. "Polytomous Effectiveness Indicators in Complex Problem-Solving Tasks and Their Applications in Developing Measurement Model," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 89(3), pages 877-902, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:psycho:v:89:y:2024:i:3:d:10.1007_s11336-024-09963-8
    DOI: 10.1007/s11336-024-09963-8
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11336-024-09963-8
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11336-024-09963-8?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. R. Darrell Bock, 1972. "Estimating item parameters and latent ability when responses are scored in two or more nominal categories," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 37(1), pages 29-51, March.
    2. Koehler, Elizabeth & Brown, Elizabeth & Haneuse, Sebastien J.-P. A., 2009. "On the Assessment of Monte Carlo Error in Simulation-Based Statistical Analyses," The American Statistician, American Statistical Association, vol. 63(2), pages 155-162.
    3. Yunxiao Chen, 2020. "A Continuous-Time Dynamic Choice Measurement Model for Problem-Solving Process Data," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 85(4), pages 1052-1075, December.
    4. Xueying Tang & Zhi Wang & Qiwei He & Jingchen Liu & Zhiliang Ying, 2020. "Latent Feature Extraction for Process Data via Multidimensional Scaling," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 85(2), pages 378-397, June.
    5. Yoav Bergner & Alina A. von Davier, 2019. "Process Data in NAEP: Past, Present, and Future," Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, , vol. 44(6), pages 706-732, December.
    6. Michelle M. LaMar, 2018. "Markov Decision Process Measurement Model," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 83(1), pages 67-88, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Luo, Nanyu & Ji, Feng & Han, Yuting & He, Jinbo & Zhang, Xiaoya, 2024. "Fitting item response theory models using deep learning computational frameworks," OSF Preprints tjxab, Center for Open Science.
    2. Susu Zhang & Zhi Wang & Jitong Qi & Jingchen Liu & Zhiliang Ying, 2023. "Accurate Assessment via Process Data," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 88(1), pages 76-97, March.
    3. Esther Ulitzsch & Qiwei He & Vincent Ulitzsch & Hendrik Molter & André Nichterlein & Rolf Niedermeier & Steffi Pohl, 2021. "Combining Clickstream Analyses and Graph-Modeled Data Clustering for Identifying Common Response Processes," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 86(1), pages 190-214, March.
    4. Michelle M. LaMar, 2018. "Markov Decision Process Measurement Model," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 83(1), pages 67-88, March.
    5. Bas Hemker & Klaas Sijtsma & Ivo Molenaar & Brian Junker, 1996. "Polytomous IRT models and monotone likelihood ratio of the total score," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 61(4), pages 679-693, December.
    6. Tsai, Tsung-Han, 2016. "A Bayesian Approach to Dynamic Panel Models with Endogenous Rarely Changing Variables," Political Science Research and Methods, Cambridge University Press, vol. 4(3), pages 595-620, September.
    7. Sijia Huang & Li Cai, 2024. "Cross-Classified Item Response Theory Modeling With an Application to Student Evaluation of Teaching," Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, , vol. 49(3), pages 311-341, June.
    8. Vitoratou, Silia & Ntzoufras, Ioannis & Moustaki, Irini, 2016. "Explaining the behavior of joint and marginal Monte Carlo estimators in latent variable models with independence assumptions," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 57685, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    9. Björn Andersson & Tao Xin, 2021. "Estimation of Latent Regression Item Response Theory Models Using a Second-Order Laplace Approximation," Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, , vol. 46(2), pages 244-265, April.
    10. Jouni Kuha & Myrsini Katsikatsou & Irini Moustaki, 2018. "Latent variable modelling with non‐ignorable item non‐response: multigroup response propensity models for cross‐national analysis," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 181(4), pages 1169-1192, October.
    11. Laine Bradshaw & Jonathan Templin, 2014. "Combining Item Response Theory and Diagnostic Classification Models: A Psychometric Model for Scaling Ability and Diagnosing Misconceptions," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 79(3), pages 403-425, July.
    12. Javier Revuelta, 2004. "Analysis of distractor difficulty in multiple-choice items," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 69(2), pages 217-234, June.
    13. Ulf Böckenholt, 2012. "The Cognitive-Miser Response Model: Testing for Intuitive and Deliberate Reasoning," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 77(2), pages 388-399, April.
    14. Albert Yu & Jeffrey A. Douglas, 2023. "IRT Models for Learning With Item-Specific Learning Parameters," Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, , vol. 48(6), pages 866-888, December.
    15. John Hsu & Tom Leonard & Kam-Wah Tsui, 1991. "Statistical inference for multiple choice tests," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 56(2), pages 327-348, June.
    16. Soekhai, V. & Donkers, B. & Levitan, B. & de Bekker-Grob, E.W., 2021. "Case 2 best-worst scaling: For good or for bad but not for both," Journal of choice modelling, Elsevier, vol. 41(C).
    17. Ghattas Badih & Michel Pierre & Boyer Laurent, 2019. "Assessing variable importance in clustering: a new method based on unsupervised binary decision trees," Computational Statistics, Springer, vol. 34(1), pages 301-321, March.
    18. R. N. Rattihalli, 2023. "A Class of Multivariate Power Skew Symmetric Distributions: Properties and Inference for the Power-Parameter," Sankhya A: The Indian Journal of Statistics, Springer;Indian Statistical Institute, vol. 85(2), pages 1356-1393, August.
    19. Tübbicke Stefan, 2022. "Entropy Balancing for Continuous Treatments," Journal of Econometric Methods, De Gruyter, vol. 11(1), pages 71-89, January.
    20. repec:hal:journl:hal-03533356 is not listed on IDEAS
    21. Zachary F. Fisher & Kenneth A. Bollen, 2020. "An Instrumental Variable Estimator for Mixed Indicators: Analytic Derivatives and Alternative Parameterizations," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 85(3), pages 660-683, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:psycho:v:89:y:2024:i:3:d:10.1007_s11336-024-09963-8. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.