IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/psycho/v72y2007i4p601-619.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Degeneracy in Candecomp/Parafac and Indscal Explained For Several Three-Sliced Arrays With A Two-Valued Typical Rank

Author

Listed:
  • Alwin Stegeman

Abstract

No abstract is available for this item.

Suggested Citation

  • Alwin Stegeman, 2007. "Degeneracy in Candecomp/Parafac and Indscal Explained For Several Three-Sliced Arrays With A Two-Valued Typical Rank," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 72(4), pages 601-619, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:psycho:v:72:y:2007:i:4:p:601-619
    DOI: 10.1007/s11336-007-9022-3
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1007/s11336-007-9022-3
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11336-007-9022-3?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Tomasi, Giorgio & Bro, Rasmus, 2006. "A comparison of algorithms for fitting the PARAFAC model," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 50(7), pages 1700-1734, April.
    2. Jos Berge, 2000. "The typical rank of tall three-way arrays," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 65(4), pages 525-532, December.
    3. Alwin Stegeman, 2006. "Degeneracy in Candecomp/Parafac explained for p × p × 2 arrays of rank p + 1 or higher," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 71(3), pages 483-501, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Nathaniel Helwig, 2013. "The Special Sign Indeterminacy of the Direct-Fitting Parafac2 Model: Some Implications, Cautions, and Recommendations for Simultaneous Component Analysis," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 78(4), pages 725-739, October.
    2. Alwin Stegeman & Tam Lam, 2014. "Three-Mode Factor Analysis by Means of Candecomp/Parafac," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 79(3), pages 426-443, July.
    3. Stegeman, Alwin, 2014. "Finding the limit of diverging components in three-way Candecomp/Parafac—A demonstration of its practical merits," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 75(C), pages 203-216.
    4. Mohammed Dosse & Jos Berge & Jorge Tendeiro, 2011. "Some New Results on Orthogonally Constrained Candecomp," Journal of Classification, Springer;The Classification Society, vol. 28(2), pages 144-155, July.
    5. Giordani, Paolo & Kiers, Henk A. L. & Del Ferraro, Maria Antonietta, 2014. "Three-Way Component Analysis Using the R Package ThreeWay," Journal of Statistical Software, Foundation for Open Access Statistics, vol. 57(i07).
    6. Paolo Giordani & Roberto Rocci, 2013. "Constrained Candecomp/Parafac via the Lasso," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 78(4), pages 669-684, October.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Paolo Giordani & Roberto Rocci, 2013. "Constrained Candecomp/Parafac via the Lasso," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 78(4), pages 669-684, October.
    2. Stegeman, Alwin, 2014. "Finding the limit of diverging components in three-way Candecomp/Parafac—A demonstration of its practical merits," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 75(C), pages 203-216.
    3. Alwin Stegeman, 2018. "Simultaneous Component Analysis by Means of Tucker3," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 83(1), pages 21-47, March.
    4. Alwin Stegeman & Tam Lam, 2014. "Three-Mode Factor Analysis by Means of Candecomp/Parafac," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 79(3), pages 426-443, July.
    5. Michele Gallo & Violetta Simonacci & Maria Anna Palma, 2019. "An integrated algorithm for three-way compositional data," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 53(5), pages 2353-2370, September.
    6. Nathaniel Helwig, 2013. "The Special Sign Indeterminacy of the Direct-Fitting Parafac2 Model: Some Implications, Cautions, and Recommendations for Simultaneous Component Analysis," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 78(4), pages 725-739, October.
    7. Wim Krijnen & Theo Dijkstra & Alwin Stegeman, 2008. "On the Non-Existence of Optimal Solutions and the Occurrence of “Degeneracy” in the CANDECOMP/PARAFAC Model," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 73(3), pages 431-439, September.
    8. Hoff, Peter D., 2011. "Hierarchical multilinear models for multiway data," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 55(1), pages 530-543, January.
    9. Carlos Martin-Barreiro & John A. Ramirez-Figueroa & Xavier Cabezas & Victor Leiva & Ana Martin-Casado & M. Purificación Galindo-Villardón, 2021. "A New Algorithm for Computing Disjoint Orthogonal Components in the Parallel Factor Analysis Model with Simulations and Applications to Real-World Data," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(17), pages 1-22, August.
    10. Giordani, Paolo & Kiers, Henk A. L. & Del Ferraro, Maria Antonietta, 2014. "Three-Way Component Analysis Using the R Package ThreeWay," Journal of Statistical Software, Foundation for Open Access Statistics, vol. 57(i07).
    11. Dawn Iacobucci & Doug Grisaffe & Wayne DeSarbo, 2017. "Statistical perceptual maps: using confidence region ellipses to enhance the interpretations of brand positions in multidimensional scaling," Journal of Marketing Analytics, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 5(3), pages 81-98, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:psycho:v:72:y:2007:i:4:p:601-619. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.