IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/psycho/v6y1941i5p323-329.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The factorial interpretation of test difficulty

Author

Listed:
  • George Ferguson

Abstract

No abstract is available for this item.

Suggested Citation

  • George Ferguson, 1941. "The factorial interpretation of test difficulty," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 6(5), pages 323-329, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:psycho:v:6:y:1941:i:5:p:323-329
    DOI: 10.1007/BF02288588
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1007/BF02288588
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/BF02288588?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Bengt O. Muthã‰N, 1989. "Dichotomous Factor Analysis of Symptom Data," Sociological Methods & Research, , vol. 18(1), pages 19-65, August.
    2. Jake Olivier & Melanie L Bell, 2013. "Effect Sizes for 2×2 Contingency Tables," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(3), pages 1-7, March.
    3. John Cotton & Donald Campbell & R. Malone, 1957. "The relationship between factorial composition of test items and measures of test reliability," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 22(4), pages 347-357, December.
    4. Karl Schweizer & Siegbert Reiß, 2019. "On the Contextual Conditions Driving a Difficulty Factor," International Journal of Statistics and Probability, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 8(5), pages 1-12, September.
    5. Stephen Schilling & R. Bock, 2005. "High-dimensional maximum marginal likelihood item factor analysis by adaptive quadrature," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 70(3), pages 533-555, September.
    6. Hössjer, Ola & Sjölander, Arvid, 2022. "Sharp lower and upper bounds for the covariance of bounded random variables," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 182(C).
    7. Morgane Innocent & Julie Lassalle & Adélaïde Amelot, 2016. "Livrable L7.1_2 : Résultats de l’étude quantitative avant lancement des dispositifs dite étude n° 1 du projet SOLENN," Working Papers hal-02016473, HAL.
    8. Hubert Brogden, 1946. "Variation in test validity with variation in the distribution of item difficulties, number of items, and degree of their intercorrelation," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 11(4), pages 197-214, December.
    9. Harold Gulliksen, 1945. "The relation of item difficulty and inter-item correlation to test variance and reliability," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 10(2), pages 79-91, June.
    10. W. Gibson, 1960. "Nonlinear factors in two dimensions," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 25(4), pages 381-392, December.
    11. Lee Cronbach, 1951. "Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 16(3), pages 297-334, September.
    12. John Carroll, 1961. "The nature of the data, or how to choose a correlation coefficient," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 26(4), pages 347-372, December.
    13. David J. Bartholomew & Ian J. Deary & Martin Lawn, 2009. "Sir Godfrey Thomson: a statistical pioneer," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 172(2), pages 467-482, April.
    14. Paul Horst, 1954. "The maximum expected correlation between two multiple-choice tests," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 19(4), pages 291-296, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:psycho:v:6:y:1941:i:5:p:323-329. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.