IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/psycho/v65y2000i4p547-549.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

On the Bock-Aitkin procedure—From an EM algorithm perspective

Author

Listed:
  • Yaowen Hsu

Abstract

No abstract is available for this item.

Suggested Citation

  • Yaowen Hsu, 2000. "On the Bock-Aitkin procedure—From an EM algorithm perspective," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 65(4), pages 547-549, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:psycho:v:65:y:2000:i:4:p:547-549
    DOI: 10.1007/BF02296345
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1007/BF02296345
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/BF02296345?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. William Strout, 1990. "A new item response theory modeling approach with applications to unidimensionality assessment and ability estimation," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 55(2), pages 293-325, June.
    2. R. Bock & Murray Aitkin, 1981. "Marginal maximum likelihood estimation of item parameters: Application of an EM algorithm," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 46(4), pages 443-459, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Norman Rose & Matthias Davier & Benjamin Nagengast, 2017. "Modeling Omitted and Not-Reached Items in IRT Models," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 82(3), pages 795-819, September.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Li Cai, 2010. "A Two-Tier Full-Information Item Factor Analysis Model with Applications," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 75(4), pages 581-612, December.
    2. Cees Glas, 1999. "Modification indices for the 2-PL and the nominal response model," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 64(3), pages 273-294, September.
    3. Sik-Yum Lee & Xin-Yuan Song, 2007. "A Unified Maximum Likelihood Approach for Analyzing Structural Equation Models With Missing Nonstandard Data," Sociological Methods & Research, , vol. 35(3), pages 352-381, February.
    4. Ying Cheng & Ke-Hai Yuan, 2010. "The Impact of Fallible Item Parameter Estimates on Latent Trait Recovery," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 75(2), pages 280-291, June.
    5. Alberto Maydeu-Olivares & Rosa Montaño, 2013. "How Should We Assess the Fit of Rasch-Type Models? Approximating the Power of Goodness-of-Fit Statistics in Categorical Data Analysis," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 78(1), pages 116-133, January.
    6. Carolina Navarro & Luis Ayala & José Labeaga, 2010. "Housing deprivation and health status: evidence from Spain," Empirical Economics, Springer, vol. 38(3), pages 555-582, June.
    7. Ji Seung Yang & Xiaying Zheng, 2018. "Item Response Data Analysis Using Stata Item Response Theory Package," Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, , vol. 43(1), pages 116-129, February.
    8. Chen, Yunxiao & Li, Xiaoou, 2022. "Determining the number of factors in high-dimensional generalized latent factor models," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 111574, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    9. Alexander Robitzsch, 2024. "Bias-Reduced Haebara and Stocking–Lord Linking," J, MDPI, vol. 7(3), pages 1-12, September.
    10. Elisabeth R. Gerber & Jeffrey B. Lewis, 2004. "Beyond the Median: Voter Preferences, District Heterogeneity, and Political Representation," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 112(6), pages 1364-1383, December.
    11. Shiyu Wang & Georgios Fellouris & Hua-Hua Chang, 2019. "Statistical Foundations for Computerized Adaptive Testing with Response Revision," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 84(2), pages 375-394, June.
    12. Ting Lin, 2007. "Identifying Optimal Items in Quality of Life Assessment," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 41(5), pages 661-672, October.
    13. Singh, Jagdip, 2004. "Tackling measurement problems with Item Response Theory: Principles, characteristics, and assessment, with an illustrative example," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 57(2), pages 184-208, February.
    14. Jules Ellis & Arnold Wollenberg, 1993. "Local homogeneity in latent trait models. A characterization of the homogeneous monotone irt model," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 58(3), pages 417-429, September.
    15. Sheng, Yanyan, 2008. "A MATLAB Package for Markov Chain Monte Carlo with a Multi-Unidimensional IRT Model," Journal of Statistical Software, Foundation for Open Access Statistics, vol. 28(i10).
    16. Joel A. Martínez-Regalado & Cinthia Leonora Murillo-Avalos & Purificación Vicente-Galindo & Mónica Jiménez-Hernández & José Luis Vicente-Villardón, 2021. "Using HJ-Biplot and External Logistic Biplot as Machine Learning Methods for Corporate Social Responsibility Practices for Sustainable Development," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(20), pages 1-16, October.
    17. Panagiota Sapouna & Dimitris Manolopoulos & Pavlos Dimitratos, 2016. "How do MNC R&D Laboratory Roles Affect Employee International Assignments?," Management International Review, Springer, vol. 56(5), pages 759-779, October.
    18. Edward Ip, 2000. "Adjusting for information inflation due to local dependency in moderately large item clusters," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 65(1), pages 73-91, March.
    19. repec:jss:jstsof:28:i10 is not listed on IDEAS
    20. Werner Wothke & George Burket & Li-Sue Chen & Furong Gao & Lianghua Shu & Mike Chia, 2011. "Multimodal Likelihoods in Educational Assessment," Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, , vol. 36(6), pages 736-754, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:psycho:v:65:y:2000:i:4:p:547-549. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.