IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/presci/v80y2001i3p297-316.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

articles: Regional innovation potential in the United States: Evidence of spatial transformation

Author

Listed:
  • Brian Ceh

    (Department of Geography, Geology and Anthropology, Indiana State University, Terre Haute, Indiana, 47809, USA)

Abstract

The new economy hypothesis identifies the southern and western parts of the United States as important source points for industrial creativity that can rival the northeast. This study shows that this viewpoint, based on patent activity, is warranted. Regional technology production in the country is being helped by the presence of professional, skilled labor, rather than manufacturing and related activities as in times past. While the northeast or midwest now operate in a much more competi tive inventive spatial system, and are being outperformed technologically by California, Texas, and Florida combined, all regions of the country are patenting inventions more than ever before.

Suggested Citation

  • Brian Ceh, 2001. "articles: Regional innovation potential in the United States: Evidence of spatial transformation," Papers in Regional Science, Springer;Regional Science Association International, vol. 80(3), pages 297-316.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:presci:v:80:y:2001:i:3:p:297-316
    Note: Received: 9 April 2001
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.de/link/service/journals/10110/papers/1080003/10800297.pdf
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Claudia Werker, 2006. "An Assessment of the Regional Innovation Policy by the European Union based on Bibliometrical Analysis," Papers on Economics and Evolution 2006-11, Philipps University Marburg, Department of Geography.
    2. Jung Won Sonn & In Kwon Park, 2011. "The Increasing Importance of Agglomeration Economies Hidden behind Convergence," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 48(10), pages 2180-2194, August.
    3. Motoyama, Yasuyuki & Cao, Cong & Appelbaum, Richard, 2014. "Observing regional divergence of Chinese nanotechnology centers," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 81(C), pages 11-21.
    4. Castaldi, Carolina & Los, Bart, 2017. "Geographical patterns in US inventive activity 1977–1998: The “regional inversion” was underestimated," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 46(7), pages 1187-1197.
    5. Maria Manta Conroy & Jennifer Evans-Cowley, 2006. "E-Participation in Planning: An Analysis of Cities Adopting On-Line Citizen Participation Tools," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 24(3), pages 371-384, June.
    6. Monschuk, Daniel C. & Miranowski, John A., 2010. "The Impacts of Local Innovation and Innovative Spillovers on Employment and Population Growth in the U.S. Midwest," Journal of Regional Analysis and Policy, Mid-Continent Regional Science Association, vol. 40(1), pages 1-10.
    7. Muniba & Baorong Yu, 2023. "Does Innovative City Pilot Policy Stimulate the Chinese Regional Innovation: An Application of DID Model," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(2), pages 1-21, January.
    8. Jung Won Sonn & Michael Storper, 2008. "The Increasing Importance of Geographical Proximity in Knowledge Production: An Analysis of US Patent Citations, 1975–1997," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 40(5), pages 1020-1039, May.
    9. Makkonen Teemu, 2011. "Innovation and Regional Socio-Economic Development - Evidence from the Finnish Local Administrative Units (1)," Bulletin of Geography. Socio-economic Series, Sciendo, vol. 15(15), pages 27-42, January.
    10. Ron Shaffer & Steve Deller & Dave Marcouiller, 2006. "Rethinking Community Economic Development," Economic Development Quarterly, , vol. 20(1), pages 59-74, February.
    11. Arntz, Melanie & Gregory, Terry, 2014. "What old stagers could teach us: Examining age complementarities in regional innovation systems," ZEW Discussion Papers 14-050, ZEW - Leibniz Centre for European Economic Research.
    12. Howells, Jeremy, 2005. "Innovation and regional economic development: A matter of perspective?," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 34(8), pages 1220-1234, October.
    13. Edward Nissan & George Carter, 2005. "Decomposition of regional metropolitan and nonmetropolitan income inequality," Journal of Economics and Finance, Springer;Academy of Economics and Finance, vol. 29(1), pages 73-84, March.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Innovation; invention; patent; technology;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • O3 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Innovation; Research and Development; Technological Change; Intellectual Property Rights
    • O51 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Economywide Country Studies - - - U.S.; Canada

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:presci:v:80:y:2001:i:3:p:297-316. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.