IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/pharmo/v8y2024i5d10.1007_s41669-024-00500-y.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Adjuvant Nivolumab for Patients with Resected Esophageal Cancer or Gastroesophageal Junction Cancer in France

Author

Listed:
  • Paul Casabianca

    (Bristol Myers Squibb France)

  • Marc Massetti

    (Public Health Expertise)

  • François-Emery Cotte

    (Bristol Myers Squibb France)

  • Romain Moreau

    (Public Health Expertise)

  • Sarah Kassahun

    (Bristol Myers Squibb UK)

  • Prianka Singh

    (Bristol Myers Squibb)

  • Inkyu Kim

    (Bristol Myers Squibb)

  • Anne-Françoise Gaudin

    (Bristol Myers Squibb France)

  • Guillaume Piessen

    (Claude Huriez Hospital, Chu Lille
    Univ. Lille, CNRS, Inserm, Chu Lille, UMR9020-U1277-CANTHER-Cancer Heterogeneity Plasticity and Resistance to Therapies
    FREGAT Working Group)

  • Henri Leleu

    (Public Health Expertise)

Abstract

Introduction Esophageal and gastroesophageal junction cancer (EC/GEJC) is a poor prognosis disease with a high risk of recurrence even in patients curatively resected. Adjuvant nivolumab is currently used for patients with completely resected (R0) EC/GEJC who have residual pathologic disease following prior neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy. This study aimed to determine the cost effectiveness of nivolumab in this indication in France according to the collective perspective excluding indirect costs. Materials and Methods A simplified four-health-state semi-Markov model was developed to model EC/GEJC patients who have residual disease after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy followed by R0 over a 15-year time horizon, comparing adjuvant nivolumab versus surveillance, which was the recommended French clinical practice before immunotherapy arrival. Time-to-recurrence (TTR) from CheckMate 577 was used to inform transition from disease-free to post-recurrence health state; patients who recurred were split according to the distribution of type of recurrence observed during the trial. Post-recurrence survival (PRS) according to the type of recurrence was derived from a real-world registry. Results Adjuvant treatment with nivolumab led to an incremental survival gain of 1.19 years (+ 34%), mostly in the disease-free state, an incremental cost of €48,634 and QALY of 0.98 resulting in an incremental cost-utility ratio (ICUR) of €49,572/QALY with limited uncertainty. ‘Cure assumption’ at 5 years had an important impact on the results (€41,115/QALY; − 17%), as that tends to increase life-years and QALYs while costs remain the same. Probabilistic sensitivity analyses confirmed reference ICUR (€52,542/QALY) with 80% probability of nivolumab being cost effective at a willingness-to-pay threshold of €75,000/QALY. Conclusions Our analysis suggests that adjuvant nivolumab is cost effective in the treatment of EC/GEJC patients who have residual disease after neoadjuvant CRT followed by R0 resection. Compared with previously evaluated cost-effectiveness analyses for other immune-checkpoint inhibitors indicated in metastatic settings, ICUR appears particularly low in this early setting thanks to the important impact on health outcomes and capped treatment duration.

Suggested Citation

  • Paul Casabianca & Marc Massetti & François-Emery Cotte & Romain Moreau & Sarah Kassahun & Prianka Singh & Inkyu Kim & Anne-Françoise Gaudin & Guillaume Piessen & Henri Leleu, 2024. "A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Adjuvant Nivolumab for Patients with Resected Esophageal Cancer or Gastroesophageal Junction Cancer in France," PharmacoEconomics - Open, Springer, vol. 8(5), pages 689-699, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:pharmo:v:8:y:2024:i:5:d:10.1007_s41669-024-00500-y
    DOI: 10.1007/s41669-024-00500-y
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s41669-024-00500-y
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s41669-024-00500-y?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:pharmo:v:8:y:2024:i:5:d:10.1007_s41669-024-00500-y. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.