IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/pharmo/v8y2024i3d10.1007_s41669-023-00470-7.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Digital Breast Tomosynthesis Added to Synthetic Mammography in Breast Cancer Screening in Brazil

Author

Listed:
  • Henrique Lima Couto

    (Brazilian Society of Mastology, Rio de Janeiro
    Brazilian Federation of Associations of Gynecologists and Obstetricians, Rio de Janeiro
    Redimama-Redimasto
    Brazilian Society of Mastology)

  • Ludmila Peres Gargano

    (Federal University of Minas Gerais
    MAPESolutions)

  • Vilmar Marques Oliveira

    (Santa Casa de São Paulo School of Medical Sciences)

  • Bertha Andrade Coelho

    (Brazilian Society of Mastology, Rio de Janeiro
    UNIFIMOC University Center)

  • Eduardo Carvalho Pessoa

    (Brazilian Society of Mastology, Rio de Janeiro
    Brazilian Federation of Associations of Gynecologists and Obstetricians, Rio de Janeiro
    Sao Paulo State University-UNESP)

  • Augusto Tufi Hassan

    (Brazilian Society of Mastology, Rio de Janeiro
    Oncoclinicas-CAM)

  • Agnaldo Lopes Silva

    (Brazilian Federation of Associations of Gynecologists and Obstetricians, Rio de Janeiro
    Sao Paulo State University-UNESP
    Federal University of Minas Gerais)

  • Linei Augusta Brolini Delle Urban

    (Brazilian College of Radiology)

  • Luciano Chala Fernandes

    (Brazilian College of Radiology)

  • Nisha Sharma

    (Leeds Teaching Hospital NHS Trust)

  • Ritse Mann

    (Radboud University Medical Center
    The Netherlands Cancer Institute)

  • Stuart A McIntosh

    (Queen’s University Belfast)

  • Fernando Zanghelini

    (MAPESolutions
    University of East Anglia)

Abstract

Background Literature meta-analysis results show that digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) combined with synthesized two-dimensional (s2D) mammograms can reduce recalls and improve breast cancer detection. Uncertainty regarding the screening of patients with breast cancer presents a health economic challenge, both in terms of healthcare resource use and quality of life impact on patients. Objective This study aims to estimate the cost effectiveness of DBT + s2D versus digital mammography (DM) used in a biennial breast cancer screening setting of women aged 40–69 years with scattered areas of fibroglandular breast density and heterogeneous dense breasts in the Brazilian supplementary health system. Methods A cost-effectiveness analysis was performed on the basis of clinical data obtained from a systematic review with meta-analysis performed to evaluate the analytical validity and clinical utility of DBT + s2D compared with DM. The search was conducted in the PubMed, Cochrane Library and Embase databases, with the main descriptors of the technology, a comparator, and the clinical condition in question, on 9 June 2022. The hybrid economic model (decision tree plus Markov model) simulated costs and outcomes over a lifetime for women aged 40–69 years with scattered areas of fibroglandular breast density and heterogeneous dense breasts. We analyzed incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) to measure the incremental cost difference per quality-adjusted life year (QALY) of adding DBT + s2D to breast cancer screening. Results DBT + s2D incurred a cost saving of € 954.02 per patient, in the time horizon of 30 years, compared with DM, and gained 5.1989 QALYs, which would be considered a dominant intervention. These results were confirmed in sensitivity analyses. Conclusion Switching from DM to biennial DBT + s2D was cost effective. Furthermore, reductions in false-positive recall rates should also be considered in decision making.

Suggested Citation

  • Henrique Lima Couto & Ludmila Peres Gargano & Vilmar Marques Oliveira & Bertha Andrade Coelho & Eduardo Carvalho Pessoa & Augusto Tufi Hassan & Agnaldo Lopes Silva & Linei Augusta Brolini Delle Urban , 2024. "Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Digital Breast Tomosynthesis Added to Synthetic Mammography in Breast Cancer Screening in Brazil," PharmacoEconomics - Open, Springer, vol. 8(3), pages 403-416, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:pharmo:v:8:y:2024:i:3:d:10.1007_s41669-023-00470-7
    DOI: 10.1007/s41669-023-00470-7
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s41669-023-00470-7
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s41669-023-00470-7?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:pharmo:v:8:y:2024:i:3:d:10.1007_s41669-023-00470-7. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.