IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/pharmo/v5y2021i3d10.1007_s41669-020-00253-4.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

High-Expenditure Disease in the EU-28: Does Drug Spend Correspond to Clinical and Economic Burden in Oncology, Autoimmune Disease and Diabetes?

Author

Listed:
  • Wolfgang Greiner

    (Bielefeld University)

  • Keyur Patel

    (IQVIA Ltd, HEOR)

  • Christina-Jane Crossman-Barnes

    (IQVIA Ltd, HEOR)

  • Troels Vingtoft Rye-Andersen

    (Novo Nordisk Region Europe Pharmaceuticals A/S)

  • Christian Hvid

    (Novo Nordisk Region Europe Pharmaceuticals A/S)

  • Tom Vandebrouck

    (Novo Nordisk Region Europe Pharmaceuticals A/S)

Abstract

Background Drug costs are increasing in Europe, and there is a heightened need to reduce pressure on healthcare systems. In 2017, oncology, autoimmune disease, and diabetes featured as the three highest therapy areas for drug spend in the EU-28. However, the absolute 1-year drug spend growth for diabetes did not feature within the ten fastest growing therapy areas. Objective This study explores the association between drug spend and disease burden in oncology, autoimmune disease, and diabetes in the EU-28. Methods Oncology, autoimmune disease and diabetes therapeutic areas were investigated using four methodologies. Historical and forecasted drug spend was analysed using the IQVIA MIDAS® drug sales database. Clinical and economic burden was estimated from targeted literature reviews. Trend analyses compared changes in drug spend with clinical burden using the Global Burden of Disease tool as the epidemiological reference. Cost per quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) from UK health technology assessments were compared to interpret the health economic value. Results Oncology had the highest historical drug spend and growth compared with autoimmune disease and diabetes. Total drug spend and growth in oncology is forecasted to exceed diabetes by twofold. Increasing oncology drug spend historically did not correspond with reductions in mortality and morbidity. Diabetes had the lowest drug spend and greatest QALY/€1000 spent benefit. Conclusion This study indicates that drug spend may not correlate to clinical burden across diseases. Future research could stimulate debate on whether more equitable drug funding may improve disease management.

Suggested Citation

  • Wolfgang Greiner & Keyur Patel & Christina-Jane Crossman-Barnes & Troels Vingtoft Rye-Andersen & Christian Hvid & Tom Vandebrouck, 2021. "High-Expenditure Disease in the EU-28: Does Drug Spend Correspond to Clinical and Economic Burden in Oncology, Autoimmune Disease and Diabetes?," PharmacoEconomics - Open, Springer, vol. 5(3), pages 385-396, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:pharmo:v:5:y:2021:i:3:d:10.1007_s41669-020-00253-4
    DOI: 10.1007/s41669-020-00253-4
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s41669-020-00253-4
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s41669-020-00253-4?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Melanie Büssgen & Tom Stargardt, 2023. "Does health technology assessment compromise access to pharmaceuticals?," The European Journal of Health Economics, Springer;Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gesundheitsökonomie (DGGÖ), vol. 24(3), pages 437-451, April.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:pharmo:v:5:y:2021:i:3:d:10.1007_s41669-020-00253-4. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.