IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/pharmo/v4y2020i1d10.1007_s41669-019-0143-2.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Health System Costs of Potentially Inappropriate Prescribing: A Population-Based, Retrospective Cohort Study Using Linked Health Administrative Databases in Ontario, Canada

Author

Listed:
  • Cody D. Black

    (University of Ottawa)

  • Kednapa Thavorn

    (University of Ottawa
    The Ottawa Hospital
    ICES uOttawa, ICES)

  • Doug Coyle

    (University of Ottawa)

  • Lise M. Bjerre

    (ICES uOttawa, ICES
    University of Ottawa
    Bruyère Research Institute)

Abstract

Objective The aim of this study was to determine the health system costs from hospitalizations, emergency department (ED) visits, and medications due to potentially inappropriate prescribing (PIP) in Ontario, Canada, at the population-level. Methods A retrospective cohort of individuals ≥ 66 years of age and prescribed at least one medication from April 2002 to March 2015 was identified using linked population-level health administrative databases from Ontario, Canada. Patients were identified as having PIP or no PIP by applying a subset of the Screening Tool of Older Persons’ Potentially Inappropriate Prescribing/Screening Tool to Alert Doctors to Right Treatment (STOPP/START) criteria. The number of days spent in hospital, new medications prescribed, and ED visits in the 90 days following PIP or patient index date were captured, as well as the total costs from each of these health services. Count regression models were used to generate incidence rate ratios (IRRs) for each outcome given the presence of PIP versus no PIP and combined with the prevalence of PIP to generate population attributable fractions (PAFs). The PAF was then multiplied by the cost for each health service to obtain the costs attributable to PIP in the whole cohort, and by age and sex. Results PIP was associated with an increased rate of hospitalization (IRR 2.77, 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.72–2.82), ED visits (IRR 1.87, 95% CI 1.82–1.92), and newly prescribed medications (IRR 1.13, 95% CI 1.13–1.14), resulting in PAFs of 55.7, 37.9, and 5.0% for each outcome, respectively. PIP was associated with 38.8% of the total spent on these healthcare services ($1.22 billion) in the 90 days after PIP. Costs attributable to PIP decreased with age despite increasing prevalence. Conclusions PIP in older adults is a significant source of health system costs from healthcare service use beyond medication costs, with a significant portion of hospitalizations and ED visit costs attributable to PIP. Future work should focus on identifying strategies and priorities for intervention.

Suggested Citation

  • Cody D. Black & Kednapa Thavorn & Doug Coyle & Lise M. Bjerre, 2020. "The Health System Costs of Potentially Inappropriate Prescribing: A Population-Based, Retrospective Cohort Study Using Linked Health Administrative Databases in Ontario, Canada," PharmacoEconomics - Open, Springer, vol. 4(1), pages 27-36, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:pharmo:v:4:y:2020:i:1:d:10.1007_s41669-019-0143-2
    DOI: 10.1007/s41669-019-0143-2
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s41669-019-0143-2
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s41669-019-0143-2?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:pharmo:v:4:y:2020:i:1:d:10.1007_s41669-019-0143-2. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.