Healthcare Resource Uses and Out-of-Pocket Expenses Associated with Pulmonary TB Treatment in Thailand

Background In Thailand, pharmaceutical care has been recently introduced to a tertiary hospital as an approach to improve adherence to tuberculosis (TB) treatment in addition to home visit and modified directly observed therapy (DOT). However, the economic impact of pharmaceutical care is not known. Objective The aim of this study was to estimate healthcare resource uses and costs associated with pharmaceutical care compared with home visit and modified DOT in pulmonary TB patients in Thailand from a healthcare sector perspective inclusive of out-of-pocket expenditures. Methods We conducted a retrospective study using data abstracted from the hospital billing database associated with pulmonary TB patients who began treatment between 2010 and 2013 in three hospitals in Thailand. We used generalized linear models to compare the costs by accounting for baseline characteristics. All costs were converted to international dollars (Intl$) Results The mean direct healthcare costs to the public payer were $519.96 (95%confidence interval [CI] 437.31–625.58) associated with pharmaceutical care, $1020.39 (95% CI 911.13–1154.11) for home visit, and $887.79 (95% CI 824.28–955.91) for modified DOT. The mean costs to patients were $175.45 (95% CI 130.26–230.48) for those receiving pharmaceutical care, $53.77 (95% CI 33.25–79.44) for home visit, and $49.33 (95% CI 34.03–69.30) for modified DOT. After adjustment for baseline characteristics, pharmaceutical care was associated with lower total direct costs compared with home visit (−$354.95; 95% CI −285.67 to −424.23) and modified DOT (−$264.61; 95% CI −198.76 to −330.46). Conclusion After adjustment for baseline characteristics, pharmaceutical care was associated with lower direct costs compared with home visit and modified DOT.