Author
Listed:
- Sandar Aye
(Karolinska Institutet, BioClinicum)
- Oskar Frisell
(Karolinska Institutet, BioClinicum
The Swedish Institute of Health Economics (IHE))
- Henrik Zetterberg
(University of Gothenburg
Sahlgrenska University Hospital
UCL Institute of Neurology
UK Dementia Research Institute at UCL)
- Tobias Borgh Skillbäck
(University of Gothenburg
Region Västra Götaland, Sahlgrenska University Hospital)
- Silke Kern
(University of Gothenburg
Region Västra Götaland, Sahlgrenska University Hospital)
- Maria Eriksdotter
(Karolinska Institutet
Karolinska University Hospital)
- Emil Aho
(Karolinska Institutet, BioClinicum)
- Xin Xia
(Karolinska Institutet, BioClinicum)
- Bengt Winblad
(Karolinska Institutet, BioClinicum
Karolinska University Hospital)
- Anders Wimo
(Karolinska Institutet, BioClinicum)
- Linus Jönsson
(Karolinska Institutet, BioClinicum)
Abstract
Background The advancement of diagnostic and therapeutic interventions in early Alzheimer’s disease (AD) has demanded the economic evaluation of such interventions. Resource utilization and cost estimates in early AD and, more specifically, the amyloid-positive population are still lacking. We aimed to provide cost estimates in AD in relation to disease severity and compare these with the control population. We also aimed to provide cost estimates for a subset of the AD population with both clinical diagnosis and amyloid-positive confirmation. Materials and Methods This was a retrospective longitudinal analysis of resource utilization using data from national registries. A cohort from the national Swedish registry for cognitive/dementia disorders (SveDem) includes all clinically diagnosed AD between 2013 and 2020. The study population included 31,951 people with AD and 63,902 age- and sex-matched controls (1:2). The population was followed until death, the end of December 2020, or 2 years from the last clinic visit. Direct medical and social costs were estimated from other national registries. Direct medical costs include costs for medications and inpatient and outpatient clinical visits. Direct social costs include costs for institutionalization, home care, short-term care, support for daytime activities, and housing support. Mean annual costs and 95% confidence intervals were obtained by bootstrapping, presented in 2021 Swedish Krona (SEK) (1 SEK = 0.117 USD, 1 SEK = 0.0985 EUR in 2021), and disaggregated by AD severity, cost component, sex, age group, and care setting. Results Mean annual costs for individuals with clinically diagnosed AD were SEK 99,906, SEK 290,972, SEK 479,524, and SEK 795,617 in mild cognitive impairment (MCI), mild, moderate, and severe AD. The mean annual costs for the population with both clinical diagnosis and amyloid-positive AD confirmation (N = 5610) were SEK 57,625, SEK 179,153, SEK 333,095, and SEK 668,073 in MCI, mild, moderate, and severe AD, respectively. The mean annual costs were higher in institutionalized than non-institutionalized patients, females than males, and older than younger age groups. Inpatient and drug costs were similar in all AD severity stages, but outpatient costs decreased with AD severity. Costs for institutionalization, home care, support for daytime activities, and short-term care increased with AD severity, whereas the cost of housing support decreased with AD severity. Conclusions This is the first study estimating annual costs in people with AD from MCI to severe AD, including those for the amyloid-positive population. The study provides cost estimates by AD severity, cost components, care settings, sex, and age groups, allowing health economic modelers to apply the costs based on different model structures and populations.
Suggested Citation
Sandar Aye & Oskar Frisell & Henrik Zetterberg & Tobias Borgh Skillbäck & Silke Kern & Maria Eriksdotter & Emil Aho & Xin Xia & Bengt Winblad & Anders Wimo & Linus Jönsson, 2025.
"Costs of Care in Relation to Alzheimer’s Disease Severity in Sweden: A National Registry-Based Cohort Study,"
PharmacoEconomics, Springer, vol. 43(2), pages 153-169, February.
Handle:
RePEc:spr:pharme:v:43:y:2025:i:2:d:10.1007_s40273-024-01443-2
DOI: 10.1007/s40273-024-01443-2
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:pharme:v:43:y:2025:i:2:d:10.1007_s40273-024-01443-2. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.