IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/pharme/v42y2024i6d10.1007_s40273-024-01371-1.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Is Risk-Stratifying Patients with Colorectal Cancer Using a Deep Learning-Based Prognostic Biomarker Cost-Effective?

Author

Listed:
  • Anna Kenseth

    (Oslo University Hospital)

  • Dominika Kantorova

    (Oslo University Hospital)

  • Mikyung Kelly Seo

    (University of Cambridge
    Queen Mary University of London
    Imperial College London)

  • Eline Aas

    (University of Oslo)

  • John Cairns

    (London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine)

  • David Kerr

    (Oxford University)

  • Hanne Askautrud

    (Oslo University Hospital)

  • Jørn Evert Jacobsen

    (Oslo University Hospital
    Vestfold Hospital Trust)

Abstract

Objectives Accurate risk stratification of patients with stage II and III colorectal cancer (CRC) prior to treatment selection enables limited health resources to be efficiently allocated to patients who are likely to benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy. We aimed to investigate the cost-effectiveness of a recently developed deep learning-based prognostic method, Histotyping, from the perspective of the Norwegian healthcare system. Methods Two partitioned survival models were developed to assess the cost-effectiveness of Histotyping for two treatment cohorts: patients with CRC stage II and III. For each of the two cohorts, Histotyping was used for risk stratification to assign adjuvant chemotherapy and was compared with the standard of care (SOC) (adjuvant chemotherapy to all patients). Health outcomes measured in the model were quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) and life years (LYs) gained. Deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were performed to determine the impact of uncertainty. Scenario analyses were performed to assess the impact of the parameters with the greatest uncertainty. Results Risk-stratifying patients with CRC stage II and III using Histotyping was dominant (less costly and more effective) compared to SOC. In patients with CRC stage II, the net monetary benefit of Histotyping was 270,934 Norwegian kroners (NOK) (year of valuation is 2021), and the net health benefit of Histotyping was 0.99. In stage III, the net monetary benefit of Histotyping was 195,419 NOK, and the net health benefit of Histotyping was 0.71. Conclusions Risk-stratifying patients with CRC using Histotyping prior to the administration of adjuvant chemotherapy is likely to be a cost-effective strategy in Norway.

Suggested Citation

  • Anna Kenseth & Dominika Kantorova & Mikyung Kelly Seo & Eline Aas & John Cairns & David Kerr & Hanne Askautrud & Jørn Evert Jacobsen, 2024. "Is Risk-Stratifying Patients with Colorectal Cancer Using a Deep Learning-Based Prognostic Biomarker Cost-Effective?," PharmacoEconomics, Springer, vol. 42(6), pages 679-691, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:pharme:v:42:y:2024:i:6:d:10.1007_s40273-024-01371-1
    DOI: 10.1007/s40273-024-01371-1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s40273-024-01371-1
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s40273-024-01371-1?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:pharme:v:42:y:2024:i:6:d:10.1007_s40273-024-01371-1. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.