IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/pharme/v42y2024i4d10.1007_s40273-023-01333-z.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The RETRIEVE Checklist for Studies Reporting the Elicitation of Stated Preferences for Child Health-Related Quality of Life

Author

Listed:
  • Cate Bailey

    (Centre for Health Policy, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne)

  • Martin Howell

    (University of Sydney
    University of Sydney)

  • Rakhee Raghunandan

    (University of Sydney
    University of Sydney)

  • Kim Dalziel

    (Centre for Health Policy, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne)

  • Kirsten Howard

    (University of Sydney
    University of Sydney)

  • Brendan Mulhern

    (University of Technology Sydney)

  • Stavros Petrou

    (University of Oxford)

  • Donna Rowen

    (University of Sheffield)

  • Amber Salisbury

    (University of Sydney
    University of Sydney)

  • Rosalie Viney

    (University of Technology Sydney)

  • Emily Lancsar

    (Research School of Population Health, Australian National University)

  • Nancy Devlin

    (Centre for Health Policy, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne)

Abstract

Background Recent systematic reviews show varying methods for eliciting, modelling, and reporting preference-based values for child health-related quality-of-life (HRQoL) outcomes, thus producing value sets with different characteristics. Reporting in many of the reviewed studies was found to be incomplete and inconsistent, making them difficult to assess. Checklists can help to improve standards of reporting; however, existing checklists do not address methodological issues for valuing child HRQoL. Existing checklists also focus on reporting methods and processes used in developing HRQoL values, with less focus on reporting of the values’ key characteristics and properties. We aimed to develop a checklist for studies generating values for child HRQoL, including for disease-specific states and value sets for generic child HRQoL instruments. Development A conceptual model provided a structure for grouping items into five modules. Potential items were sourced from an adult HRQoL checklist review, with additional items specific to children developed using recent reviews. Checklist items were reduced by eliminating duplication and overlap, then refined for relevance and clarity via an iterative process. Long and short checklist versions were produced for different user needs. The resulting long RETRIEVE contains 83 items, with modules for reporting methods (A–D) and characteristics of values (E), for researchers planning and reporting child health valuation studies. The short RETRIEVE contains 14 items for decision makers or researchers choosing value sets. Conclusion Applying the RETRIEVE checklists to relevant studies suggests feasibility. RETRIEVE has the potential to improve completeness in the reporting of preference-based values for child HRQOL outcomes and to improve assessment of preference-based value sets.

Suggested Citation

  • Cate Bailey & Martin Howell & Rakhee Raghunandan & Kim Dalziel & Kirsten Howard & Brendan Mulhern & Stavros Petrou & Donna Rowen & Amber Salisbury & Rosalie Viney & Emily Lancsar & Nancy Devlin, 2024. "The RETRIEVE Checklist for Studies Reporting the Elicitation of Stated Preferences for Child Health-Related Quality of Life," PharmacoEconomics, Springer, vol. 42(4), pages 435-446, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:pharme:v:42:y:2024:i:4:d:10.1007_s40273-023-01333-z
    DOI: 10.1007/s40273-023-01333-z
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s40273-023-01333-z
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s40273-023-01333-z?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:pharme:v:42:y:2024:i:4:d:10.1007_s40273-023-01333-z. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.