IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/pharme/v42y2024i11d10.1007_s40273-024-01426-3.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Drug Pricing Stewardship from Mark Cuban’s Cost Plus Generic Drug Program

Author

Listed:
  • Snigdha Gulati

    (Cleveland Clinic)

  • Mohak Gupta

    (Cleveland Clinic)

  • TingTing Yan

    (Harvard University)

  • Sneha Yelamanchili

    (Harvard University)

  • Lucy Qinghua Xu

    (Harvard University)

  • Tina Bharani

    (Thomas Jefferson University Hospital)

  • Ali Naji

    (University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine)

  • Divyansh Agarwal

    (Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School
    Massachusetts Institute of Technology)

Abstract

Importance The exceedingly high US spending per capita on prescription medications is mediated, at least in part, by the inefficiencies of existing generic pharmaceutical distribution and reimbursement systems; yet, the extent of potential savings and areas for targeted interventions for generic drug prescribers remains underexplored. Objective We aimed to analyze 2021 Medicare Part D spending on generic drugs in comparison with pricing of a low-cost generic drug program, the Mark Cuban Cost Plus Drug Company (MCCPDC), to gauge the extent of achievable potential savings. Design, Setting, and Participants In this retrospective, observational study, we performed a systematic analysis of potential Medicare Part D savings when using MCCPDC generic pricing. The 2023 MCCPDC data, as of August 2023, were obtained from the provider’s publicly available database. The 2021 Medicare Part D data and prescriber datasets were obtained from the US Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. Main Outcomes and Measures Outcomes included total prescription volume, proportion of drugs with savings, total US dollar Medicare savings, and average weighted price reduction per unit drug. Results were stratified by medical and surgical subspecialties to identify areas for targeted interventions. Subspecialty-wise contribution to total savings versus contribution to total prescription volume was characterized. Results Total estimated Medicare Part D savings were $8.6 billion using 90-day MCCPDC pricing, with surgical drugs accounting for over $900 million. Nearly 80% of the examined drugs were more price effective through MCCPDC using 90-day supply. Commonly prescribed drugs in cardiology, psychiatry, neurology, transplant surgery, and urology demonstrated the highest estimated absolute savings. The most disproportionate savings relative to prescription volume were observed for drugs in oncology, gynecology, infectious disease, transplant surgery, and colorectal surgery. Conclusions and Relevance This study underscores the significant potential for Medicare Part D savings through strategies that address the systemic overpayment for generic medications. We identified key areas for reform as well as specific medical and surgical subspecialties where targeted interventions could yield substantial savings.

Suggested Citation

  • Snigdha Gulati & Mohak Gupta & TingTing Yan & Sneha Yelamanchili & Lucy Qinghua Xu & Tina Bharani & Ali Naji & Divyansh Agarwal, 2024. "Drug Pricing Stewardship from Mark Cuban’s Cost Plus Generic Drug Program," PharmacoEconomics, Springer, vol. 42(11), pages 1279-1286, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:pharme:v:42:y:2024:i:11:d:10.1007_s40273-024-01426-3
    DOI: 10.1007/s40273-024-01426-3
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s40273-024-01426-3
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s40273-024-01426-3?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:pharme:v:42:y:2024:i:11:d:10.1007_s40273-024-01426-3. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.