IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/pharme/v42y2024i11d10.1007_s40273-024-01420-9.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Bring Out Your Dead: A Review of the Cost Minimisation Approach in Health Technology Assessment Submissions to the Australian Pharmaceutical Benefits Advisory Committee

Author

Listed:
  • Zachary Tirrell

    (Macquarie University, Macquarie University Centre for the Health Economy
    Macquarie University
    Macquarie University)

  • Alicia Norman

    (Macquarie University, Macquarie University Centre for the Health Economy
    Macquarie University
    Macquarie University)

  • Martin Hoyle

    (Macquarie University, Macquarie University Centre for the Health Economy
    Macquarie University
    Macquarie University)

  • Sean Lybrand

    (Macquarie University, Macquarie University Centre for the Health Economy)

  • Bonny Parkinson

    (Macquarie University, Macquarie University Centre for the Health Economy
    Macquarie University
    Macquarie University)

Abstract

Objectives Published literature has levied criticism against the cost-minimisation analysis (CMA) approach to economic evaluation over the past two decades, with multiple papers declaring its ‘death’. However, since introducing the requirements for economic evaluations as part of health technology (HTA) decision-making in 1992, the cost-minimisation analysis (CMA) approach has been widely used to inform recommendations about the public subsidy of medicines in Australia. This research aimed to highlight the breadth of use of CMA in Australia and assess the influence of preconditions for the approach on subsidy recommendations Methods Relevant information was extracted from Public Summary Documents of Pharmaceutical Benefits Advisory Committee (PBAC) meetings in Australia considering submissions for the subsidy of medicines that included a CMA and were assessed between July 2005 and December 2022. A generalised linear model was used to explore the relationship between whether medicines were recommended and variables that reflected the primary preconditions for using CMA set out in the published PBAC Methodology Guidelines. Other control variables were selected through the Bolasso Method. Subgroup analysis was undertaken which replicated this modelling process. Results While the potential for inferior safety or efficacy reduced the likelihood of recommendation (p

Suggested Citation

  • Zachary Tirrell & Alicia Norman & Martin Hoyle & Sean Lybrand & Bonny Parkinson, 2024. "Bring Out Your Dead: A Review of the Cost Minimisation Approach in Health Technology Assessment Submissions to the Australian Pharmaceutical Benefits Advisory Committee," PharmacoEconomics, Springer, vol. 42(11), pages 1287-1300, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:pharme:v:42:y:2024:i:11:d:10.1007_s40273-024-01420-9
    DOI: 10.1007/s40273-024-01420-9
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s40273-024-01420-9
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s40273-024-01420-9?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:pharme:v:42:y:2024:i:11:d:10.1007_s40273-024-01420-9. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.