IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/pharme/v41y2023i9d10.1007_s40273-023-01261-y.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Estimating Global Friction Periods for Economic Evaluation: A Case Study of Selected OECD Member Countries

Author

Listed:
  • Paul Hanly

    (National College of Ireland)

  • Marta Ortega Ortega

    (Complutense University of Madrid)

  • Alison Pearce

    (The University of Sydney)

  • Marianna Camargo Cancela

    (Brazilian National Cancer Institute, Ministry of Health)

  • Isabelle Soerjomataram

    (International Agency for Research on Cancer)

  • Linda Sharp

    (Population Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University Centre for Cancer, Sir James Spence Institute, Royal Victoria Infirmary)

Abstract

Background The friction cost approach (FCA) offers an alternative to the dominant human capital approach to value productivity losses. Application of the FCA in practice is limited largely due to data availability. Recent attempts have tried to standardise the estimation of friction periods across Europe, but to date, this has not been attempted elsewhere. Our aim was to estimate friction periods for 17 Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) member countries between 2010 and 2021 based on routinely published data. Methods We derived friction period estimates for Australia, Austria, Canada, Czechia, Finland, Germany, Hungary, Japan, Korea, Luxembourg, Norway, Poland, Portugal, Sweden, Switzerland, the United Kingdom and the United States. Vacancy stock and flow data was sourced from the OECD’s short-term labour situation database from 2010 to 2021, and included the impact of Covid-19 on the labour market. The estimated friction periods were applied to cost cancer-related premature mortality for the United States as an illustrative case. Results The average friction period in the five non-European countries (Australia, Canada, Korea, Japan and the United States) was 61.0 days (SD 9.4) (range between 44.8 days in Korea and 82.2 days in Canada) and the average friction period in the 12 European countries was 60.6 days (SD 14.8) (range between 34.1 days in Switzerland and 137.3 days in Czechia). In both cases, the outbreak of Covid-19 increased the length of the friction period. Our illustrative case revealed that productivity costs in the US were over a third lower using the study-specific friction period (56 days) compared with the conventionally assumed 90-day friction period applied in the literature as a default measure. Conclusions Our results expand the potential application of the FCA outside of Europe and will support greater utilisation of the FCA and wider inclusion of productivity costs in societal-based economic evaluations based on the use of widely available and updated key labour market variables in our selected countries.

Suggested Citation

  • Paul Hanly & Marta Ortega Ortega & Alison Pearce & Marianna Camargo Cancela & Isabelle Soerjomataram & Linda Sharp, 2023. "Estimating Global Friction Periods for Economic Evaluation: A Case Study of Selected OECD Member Countries," PharmacoEconomics, Springer, vol. 41(9), pages 1093-1101, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:pharme:v:41:y:2023:i:9:d:10.1007_s40273-023-01261-y
    DOI: 10.1007/s40273-023-01261-y
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s40273-023-01261-y
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s40273-023-01261-y?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jamison Pike & Scott D. Grosse, 2018. "Friction Cost Estimates of Productivity Costs in Cost-of-Illness Studies in Comparison with Human Capital Estimates: A Review," Applied Health Economics and Health Policy, Springer, vol. 16(6), pages 765-778, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Hanly, Paul & Ortega Ortega, Marta & Pearce, Alison & Soerjomataram, Isabelle & Sharp, Linda, 2020. "Advances in the methodological approach to friction period estimation: A European perspective," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 264(C).
    2. Peter Lindgren & Sofia Löfvendahl & Gunnar Brådvik & Ola Weiland & Bengt Jönsson, 2022. "Value appropriation in hepatitis C," The European Journal of Health Economics, Springer;Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gesundheitsökonomie (DGGÖ), vol. 23(6), pages 1059-1070, August.
    3. Santini, Ziggi Ivan & Thygesen, Lau Caspar & Koyanagi, Ai & Stewart-Brown, Sarah & Meilstrup, Charlotte & Nielsen, Line & Olsen, Kim Rose & Birkjær, Michael & McDaid, David & Koushede, Vibeke & Ekholm, 2022. "Economics of mental wellbeing: a prospective study estimating associated productivity costs due to sickness absence from the workplace in Denmark," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 116690, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    4. Juan Oliva-Moreno & Marta Trapero-Bertran & Luz María Peña-Longobardo, 2019. "Gender Differences in Labour Losses Associated with Smoking-Related Mortality," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(19), pages 1-19, September.
    5. Yashika Chugh & Radha Krishan Dhiman & Madhumita Premkumar & Shankar Prinja & Gagandeep Singh Grover & Pankaj Bahuguna, 2019. "Real-world cost-effectiveness of pan-genotypic Sofosbuvir-Velpatasvir combination versus genotype dependent directly acting anti-viral drugs for treatment of hepatitis C patients in the universal cove," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(8), pages 1-24, August.
    6. Nicolas Iragorri & Claire Oliveira & Natalie Fitzgerald & Beverley Essue, 2021. "The Indirect Cost Burden of Cancer Care in Canada: A Systematic Literature Review," Applied Health Economics and Health Policy, Springer, vol. 19(3), pages 325-341, May.
    7. Katarzyna Orlewska & Pawel Orlewski & Justyna Klusek, 2021. "Suicide among Polish Adolescents—A 20 Year Analysis," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(6), pages 1-12, March.
    8. Beata Gavurova & Miriama Tarhanicova, 2021. "Methods for Estimating Avoidable Costs of Excessive Alcohol Consumption," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(9), pages 1-25, May.
    9. Błażej Łyszczarz & Karolina Sowa, 2022. "Production losses due to mortality associated with modifiable health risk factors in Poland," The European Journal of Health Economics, Springer;Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gesundheitsökonomie (DGGÖ), vol. 23(1), pages 33-45, February.
    10. Ina Rissanen & Leena Ala-Mursula & Iiro Nerg & Marko Korhonen, 2021. "Adjusted productivity costs of stroke by human capital and friction cost methods: a Northern Finland Birth Cohort 1966 study," The European Journal of Health Economics, Springer;Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gesundheitsökonomie (DGGÖ), vol. 22(4), pages 531-545, June.
    11. Baudouin Standaert & Christophe Sauboin & Quentin J. Leclerc & Mark P. Connolly, 2021. "Comparing the Analysis and Results of a Modified Social Accounting Matrix Framework with Conventional Methods of Reporting Indirect Non-Medical Costs," PharmacoEconomics, Springer, vol. 39(2), pages 257-269, February.
    12. L. M. Peña-Longobardo & J. Oliva-Moreno & C. Fernández-Rodriguez, 2023. "The effect of hepatitis C—associated premature deaths on labour productivity losses in Spain: a ten-year analysis," The European Journal of Health Economics, Springer;Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gesundheitsökonomie (DGGÖ), vol. 24(8), pages 1271-1283, November.
    13. Johan A. Liseth Hansen & Thomas Fast & Knut Reidar Wangen, 2023. "Productivity Loss Across Socioeconomic Groups Among Patients With Low Back Pain or Osteoarthritis: Estimates Using the Friction-Cost Approach in Norway," PharmacoEconomics, Springer, vol. 41(9), pages 1079-1091, September.
    14. Patel, Anita & McDaid, David, 2019. "Methods for assessing costs of gambling related harms and cost-effectiveness of interventions," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 105220, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    15. Marco Hafner & Erez Yerushalmi & Fredrik L. Andersson & Teodor Burtea, 2023. "Partially different? The importance of general equilibrium in health economic evaluations: An application to nocturia," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 32(3), pages 654-674, March.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:pharme:v:41:y:2023:i:9:d:10.1007_s40273-023-01261-y. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.