IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/pharme/v40y2022i10d10.1007_s40273-022-01163-5.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Budget Impact Analysis of Vibegron for the Treatment of Overactive Bladder in the USA

Author

Listed:
  • Jing Voon Chen

    (Medical Decision Modeling)

  • James C. Gahn

    (Medical Decision Modeling)

  • Jeffrey Nesheim

    (Urovant Sciences)

  • Paul N. Mudd,

    (Urovant Sciences)

Abstract

Background Overactive bladder (OAB) is associated with considerable clinical and economic burden. Treatment of patients with OAB using anticholinergics is limited by tolerability issues and increased anticholinergic burden, which is associated with increased risk of dementia and falls/fractures. This analysis assessed the budget impact of introducing the β3-adrenergic agonist vibegron for the treatment of patients with OAB from US commercial payor and Medicare perspectives. Methods A budget impact model (BIM) with a 5-year time horizon was developed using a top-down, prevalence-based approach and projected market shares for 1-million-member US commercial and Medicare plans. The BIM included vibegron, mirabegron, and anticholinergics, incorporating changes in clinical outcomes (efficacy, drug–drug interactions, anticholinergic burden (ACB), OAB-related comorbidities, and adverse events (AEs)). Costs per member per month (PMPM) and per treated member per month (PTMPM) were determined. One-way sensitivity analyses quantified the impact of changes in key variables. Results The introduction of vibegron was associated with a modest increase in PMPM cost over 5 years of $0.12 (range for years 1‒5, $0.01‒$0.26) for commercial payors and $0.24 ($0.01‒$0.52) for Medicare (PTMPM cost: $2.70 ($0.17‒$4.85) and $3.15 ($0.19‒$5.82), respectively). Costs were partially offset by savings related to decreased third-line treatment use, yearly decreases in AE and comorbidity incidence, reduced drug–drug interactions, and reduced ACB associated with vibegron introduction. PMPM costs were most sensitive to vibegron market share assumptions, OAB prevalence, and vibegron persistence at 1 month for private payors and Medicare and additionally vibegron persistence at 12 months for Medicare. Conclusions Vibegron may address unmet needs in treating OAB and is a useful addition to health plans while minimizing risks of anticholinergic AEs, ACB, and drug–drug interactions, which may partially offset increased pharmacy costs.

Suggested Citation

  • Jing Voon Chen & James C. Gahn & Jeffrey Nesheim & Paul N. Mudd,, 2022. "Budget Impact Analysis of Vibegron for the Treatment of Overactive Bladder in the USA," PharmacoEconomics, Springer, vol. 40(10), pages 979-988, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:pharme:v:40:y:2022:i:10:d:10.1007_s40273-022-01163-5
    DOI: 10.1007/s40273-022-01163-5
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s40273-022-01163-5
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s40273-022-01163-5?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Hélène Parise & Robert Espinosa & Katherine Dea & Pablo Anaya & Giovanny Montoya & Daniel Bin Ng, 2020. "Cost Effectiveness of Mirabegron Compared with Antimuscarinic Agents for the Treatment of Adults with Overactive Bladder in Colombia," PharmacoEconomics - Open, Springer, vol. 4(1), pages 79-90, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.

      More about this item

      Statistics

      Access and download statistics

      Corrections

      All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:pharme:v:40:y:2022:i:10:d:10.1007_s40273-022-01163-5. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

      If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

      If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

      If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

      For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

      Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

      IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.