IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/pharme/v39y2021i8d10.1007_s40273-021-01047-0.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Circulating Tumour DNA as a Potential Cost-Effective Biomarker to Reduce Adjuvant Chemotherapy Overtreatment in Stage II Colorectal Cancer

Author

Listed:
  • Yat Hang To

    (Walter and Eliza Hall Institute
    Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre)

  • Koen Degeling

    (University of Melbourne
    University of Melbourne)

  • Suzanne Kosmider

    (Western Health)

  • Rachel Wong

    (Walter and Eliza Hall Institute
    Eastern Health
    Monash University)

  • Margaret Lee

    (Walter and Eliza Hall Institute
    Western Health
    Eastern Health
    Monash University)

  • Catherine Dunn

    (Walter and Eliza Hall Institute
    Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre)

  • Grace Gard

    (Walter and Eliza Hall Institute
    Western Health)

  • Azim Jalali

    (Walter and Eliza Hall Institute
    Western Health
    LaTrobe Regional Hospital)

  • Vanessa Wong

    (Walter and Eliza Hall Institute
    Ballarat Health)

  • Maarten IJzerman

    (University of Melbourne
    University of Melbourne
    Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre)

  • Peter Gibbs

    (Walter and Eliza Hall Institute
    Western Health
    University of Melbourne)

  • Jeanne Tie

    (Walter and Eliza Hall Institute
    Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre
    Western Health
    University of Melbourne)

Abstract

Background and Objective Substantial adjuvant chemotherapy (AC) overtreatment for stage II colorectal cancer results in a health and financial burden. Circulating tumour DNA (ctDNA) can improve patient selection for AC by detecting micro-metastatic disease. We estimated the health economic potential of ctDNA-guided AC for stage II colorectal cancer. Methods A cost-utility analysis was performed to compare ctDNA-guided AC to standard of care, where 22.6% of standard of care patients and all ctDNA-positive patients (8.7% of tested patients) received AC and all ctDNA-negative patients (91.3%) did not. A third preference-sensitive ctDNA strategy was included where 6.8% of ctDNA-negative patients would receive AC. A state-transition model was populated using data from a prospective cohort study and clinical registries. Health and economic outcomes were discounted at 5% over a lifetime horizon from a 2019 Australian payer perspective. Extensive scenario and probabilistic analyses quantified model uncertainty. Results Compared to standard of care, the ctDNA and preference-sensitive ctDNA strategies increased quality-adjusted life-years by 0.20 (95% confidence interval − 0.40 to 0.81) and 0.19 (− 0.40 to 0.78), and resulted in incremental costs of AUD − 4055 (− 16,853 to 8472) and AUD − 2284 (− 14,685 to 10,116), respectively. Circulating tumour DNA remained cost effective at a willingness to pay of AUD 20,000 per quality-adjusted life-year gained throughout most scenario analyses in which the proportion of ctDNA-positive patients cured by AC and compliance to a ctDNA-negative test results were decreased. Conclusions Circulating tumour-guided AC is a potentially cost-effective strategy towards reducing overtreatment in stage II colorectal cancer. Results from ongoing randomised clinical studies will be important to reduce uncertainty in the estimates.

Suggested Citation

  • Yat Hang To & Koen Degeling & Suzanne Kosmider & Rachel Wong & Margaret Lee & Catherine Dunn & Grace Gard & Azim Jalali & Vanessa Wong & Maarten IJzerman & Peter Gibbs & Jeanne Tie, 2021. "Circulating Tumour DNA as a Potential Cost-Effective Biomarker to Reduce Adjuvant Chemotherapy Overtreatment in Stage II Colorectal Cancer," PharmacoEconomics, Springer, vol. 39(8), pages 953-964, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:pharme:v:39:y:2021:i:8:d:10.1007_s40273-021-01047-0
    DOI: 10.1007/s40273-021-01047-0
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s40273-021-01047-0
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s40273-021-01047-0?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Maarten Ijzerman & Lotte Steuten, 2011. "Early assessment of medical technologies to inform product development and market access," Applied Health Economics and Health Policy, Springer, vol. 9(5), pages 331-347, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Wang, Yi & Rattanavipapong, Waranya & Teerawattananon, Yot, 2021. "Using health technology assessment to set priority, inform target product profiles, and design clinical study for health innovation," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 172(C).
    2. Rowan Iskandar & Carlo Federici & Cassandra Berns & Carl Rudolf Blankart, 2022. "An approach to quantify parameter uncertainty in early assessment of novel health technologies," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 31(S1), pages 116-134, September.
    3. Markiewicz, Katarzyna & van Til, Janine A. & Steuten, Lotte M.G. & IJzerman, Maarten J., 2016. "Commercial viability of medical devices using Headroom and return on investment calculation," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 112(C), pages 338-346.
    4. Esther A. Boudewijns & Thomas M. Otten & Mariam Gobianidze & Bram L. Ramaekers & Onno C. P. Schayck & Manuela A. Joore, 2023. "Headroom Analysis for Early Economic Evaluation: A Systematic Review," Applied Health Economics and Health Policy, Springer, vol. 21(2), pages 195-204, March.
    5. Maarten J. IJzerman & Hendrik Koffijberg & Elisabeth Fenwick & Murray Krahn, 2017. "Emerging Use of Early Health Technology Assessment in Medical Product Development: A Scoping Review of the Literature," PharmacoEconomics, Springer, vol. 35(7), pages 727-740, July.
    6. Florian Methling & Steffen A. Borden & Deepak Veeraraghavan & Insa Sommer & Johannes Ulrich Siebert & Rüdiger von Nitzsch & Mark Seidler, 2022. "Supporting Innovation in Early-Stage Pharmaceutical Development Decisions," Decision Analysis, INFORMS, vol. 19(4), pages 337-353, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:pharme:v:39:y:2021:i:8:d:10.1007_s40273-021-01047-0. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.