IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/pharme/v39y2021i1d10.1007_s40273-020-00976-6.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Budget Impact Analysis of Gemtuzumab Ozogamicin for the Treatment of CD33-Positive Acute Myeloid Leukemia

Author

Listed:
  • Carla Mamolo

    (Pfizer Inc)

  • Verna Welch

    (Pfizer Inc)

  • Roland B. Walter

    (Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center
    University of Washington)

  • Joseph C. Cappelleri

    (Pfizer Inc)

  • James Brockbank

    (RTI Health Solutions)

  • Matthew Cawson

    (RTI Health Solutions)

  • Chris Knight

    (RTI Health Solutions)

  • Michele Wilson

    (RTI Health Solutions)

Abstract

Background Gemtuzumab ozogamicin (GO) was approved in 2017 in the US for the treatment of adults with newly diagnosed CD33-positive (CD33+) acute myeloid leukemia (AML), and adults and pediatric patients with CD33+ relapsed/refractory (R/R) AML. Objective The aim of this study was to estimate the budgetary impact of introducing GO to a 1-million-member US health plan over a 5-year period. Methods We developed models to estimate the impact of introducing GO in combination with conventional induction chemotherapy or as monotherapy for newly diagnosed AML, and as monotherapy for R/R AML. Models were built using data on drug costs and treatment-related outcomes obtained from published clinical trials and other publicly available sources. Results were reported on a per member/per year and per member/per month (PMPM) basis. Results Base-case results of the newly diagnosed model indicated that the addition of GO in the combination setting reduced the overall budget of a 1-million-member health plan. The estimated net cost (US$) savings ranged from $72,969 ($0.006 PMPM) in year 1 to $745,426 ($0.062 PMPM) in year 5. In the monotherapy setting, GO was associated with increased net costs ranging from $4118 (0.0003 PMPM) in year 1 to $31,885 ($0.003 PMPM) in year 5. Base-case results of the R/R AML model demonstrated increased net costs that ranged from $17,326 ($0.001 PMPM) in year 1 to $46,163 ($0.004 PMPM) in year 5. Scenario analyses in all settings indicated the budget impact was not overly sensitive to the selected input assumptions, with the exception of the scenario considering only the pharmacy budget impact in the combination setting. Conclusions The introduction of GO for newly diagnosed and R/R AML would have a minimal impact on the budget of a US health plan and could result in cost savings in the combination therapy setting for newly diagnosed AML.

Suggested Citation

  • Carla Mamolo & Verna Welch & Roland B. Walter & Joseph C. Cappelleri & James Brockbank & Matthew Cawson & Chris Knight & Michele Wilson, 2021. "Budget Impact Analysis of Gemtuzumab Ozogamicin for the Treatment of CD33-Positive Acute Myeloid Leukemia," PharmacoEconomics, Springer, vol. 39(1), pages 121-131, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:pharme:v:39:y:2021:i:1:d:10.1007_s40273-020-00976-6
    DOI: 10.1007/s40273-020-00976-6
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s40273-020-00976-6
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s40273-020-00976-6?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Blog mentions

    As found by EconAcademics.org, the blog aggregator for Economics research:
    1. Chris Sampson’s journal round-up for 18th January 2021
      by Chris Sampson in The Academic Health Economists' Blog on 2021-01-18 12:00:03

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:pharme:v:39:y:2021:i:1:d:10.1007_s40273-020-00976-6. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.