IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/pharme/v36y2018i8d10.1007_s40273-018-0652-3.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Does Non-Adherence Increase Treatment Costs in Schizophrenia?

Author

Listed:
  • Mark Pennington

    (King’s College London)

  • Paul McCrone

    (King’s College London)

Abstract

Introduction Medication non-adherence is a serious barrier to treatment of schizophrenia. Understanding the impact of non-adherence on costs is essential to the assessment of the cost effectiveness of interventions in which adherence to treatment is a concern. Objectives We undertook a comprehensive review of the available literature on the impact on costs of non-adherence to antipsychotics in the treatment of schizophrenia. Methods We performed a search on multiple databases (MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO and Health Management Information Consortium) for any study reporting the impact of adherence to antipsychotics on costs in patients with schizophrenia up to February 2018. We included trials of behavioural interventions but excluded comparisons of different pharmacological therapies. Studies were included if at least one-third of the study population had schizophrenia and costs were reported. Results Thirty-four publications on 28 studies met the inclusion criteria. Twenty studies reported analyses of administrative databases, primarily Medicaid. Findings on healthcare costs were mixed but suggested that lower pharmacy costs in non-adherent patients may outweigh increased hospitalisation costs where drug costs are relatively high. A few studies published analysis of prospective cohort data, or trials of behavioural interventions intended to influence adherence, mainly in a European setting. Findings were again mixed but indicate that increasing adherence does not reduce overall costs. Conclusions Inference from analysis of administrative data is limited by the risk of selection bias. Inference from trials is limited by small sample sizes. The literature does not consistently support an assumption that non-adherence increases healthcare costs.

Suggested Citation

  • Mark Pennington & Paul McCrone, 2018. "Does Non-Adherence Increase Treatment Costs in Schizophrenia?," PharmacoEconomics, Springer, vol. 36(8), pages 941-955, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:pharme:v:36:y:2018:i:8:d:10.1007_s40273-018-0652-3
    DOI: 10.1007/s40273-018-0652-3
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s40273-018-0652-3
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s40273-018-0652-3?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Priebe, Stefan & Bremner, Stephen A. & Lauber, Christoph & Henderson, Catherine & Burns, Tom, 2016. "Financial incentives to improve adherence to antipsychotic maintenance medication in non-adherent patients: a cluster randomised controlled trial," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 68110, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Arnold P M van der Lee & Lieuwe de Haan & Aartjan T F Beekman, 2019. "Rising co-payments coincide with unwanted effects on continuity of healthcare for patients with schizophrenia in the Netherlands," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(9), pages 1-13, September.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.

      More about this item

      Statistics

      Access and download statistics

      Corrections

      All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:pharme:v:36:y:2018:i:8:d:10.1007_s40273-018-0652-3. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

      If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

      If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

      If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

      For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

      Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

      IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.