IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/pharme/v36y2018i1d10.1007_s40273-017-0568-3.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Olaratumab in Combination with Doxorubicin for the Treatment of Advanced Soft Tissue Sarcoma: An Evidence Review Group Perspective of a National Institute for Health and Care Excellence Single Technology Appraisal

Author

Listed:
  • Irina A. Tikhonova

    (Peninsula Technology Assessment Group (PenTAG))

  • Tracey Jones-Hughes

    (Peninsula Technology Assessment Group (PenTAG))

  • James Dunham

    (Peninsula Technology Assessment Group (PenTAG))

  • Fiona C. Warren

    (Peninsula Technology Assessment Group (PenTAG))

  • Sophie Robinson

    (Peninsula Technology Assessment Group (PenTAG))

  • Peter Stephens

    (Royal Devon and Exeter NHS Foundation Trust)

  • Martin Hoyle

    (Peninsula Technology Assessment Group (PenTAG))

Abstract

The manufacturer of olaratumab (Lartruvo®), Eli Lilly & Company Limited, submitted evidence for the clinical and cost effectiveness of this drug, in combination with doxorubicin, for untreated advanced soft tissue sarcoma (STS) not amenable to surgery or radiotherapy, as part of the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) Single Technology Appraisal process. The Peninsula Technology Assessment Group, commissioned to act as the Evidence Review Group (ERG), critically reviewed the company’s submission. Clinical effectiveness evidence for the company’s analysis was derived from an open-label, randomised controlled trial, JGDG. The analysis was based on a partitioned survival model with a time horizon of 25 years, and the perspective was of the UK National Health Service (NHS) and Personal Social Services. Costs and benefits were discounted at 3.5% per year. Given the available evidence, olaratumab is likely to meet NICE’s end-of-life criteria. To improve the cost effectiveness of olaratumab, the company offered a discount through a Commercial Access Agreement (CAA) with the NHS England. When the discount was applied, the mean base-case and probabilistic incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) for olaratumab plus doxorubicin versus the standard-of-care doxorubicin were £46,076 and £47,127 per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) gained, respectively; the probability of this treatment being cost effective at the willingness-to-pay threshold of £50,000 per QALY gained, applicable to end-of-life treatments, was 0.54. The respective ICERs from the ERG’s analysis were approximately £60,000/QALY gained, and the probability of the treatment being cost effective was 0.21. In August 2017, the NICE Appraisal Committee recommended olaratumab in combination with doxorubicin for this indication for use via the UK Cancer Drugs Fund under the agreed CAA until further evidence being collected in the ongoing phase III trial—ANNOUNCE—becomes available in December 2020.

Suggested Citation

  • Irina A. Tikhonova & Tracey Jones-Hughes & James Dunham & Fiona C. Warren & Sophie Robinson & Peter Stephens & Martin Hoyle, 2018. "Olaratumab in Combination with Doxorubicin for the Treatment of Advanced Soft Tissue Sarcoma: An Evidence Review Group Perspective of a National Institute for Health and Care Excellence Single Technol," PharmacoEconomics, Springer, vol. 36(1), pages 39-49, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:pharme:v:36:y:2018:i:1:d:10.1007_s40273-017-0568-3
    DOI: 10.1007/s40273-017-0568-3
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s40273-017-0568-3
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s40273-017-0568-3?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:pharme:v:36:y:2018:i:1:d:10.1007_s40273-017-0568-3. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.