IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/opsear/v55y2018i1d10.1007_s12597-017-0318-5.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A minimum spanning tree based heuristic for the travelling salesman tour

Author

Listed:
  • Santosh Kumar

    (University of Melbourne)

  • Elias Munapo

    (North West University, Mafikeng Campus)

  • ‘Maseka Lesaoana

    (University of Limpopo)

  • Philimon Nyamugure

    (National University of Science and Technology)

Abstract

This paper presents a heuristic to find the travelling salesman tour (TST) in a connected network. The approach first identifies a node and two associated arcs that are desirable for inclusion in the required TST. If we let this node be denoted by $$p$$ p and two selected arcs emanating from this node be denoted by $$\left( {p,q} \right)\,{\text{and}}\,\left( {p,k} \right),$$ p , q and p , k , then we find a path joining the two nodes $$q\,{\text{and}}\, k$$ q and k passing through all the remaining nodes of the given network. A sum of these lengths, i.e. length of the links $$\left( {p,q} \right)\,{\text{and}}\,\left( {p,k} \right)$$ p , q and p , k along with the length of the path that joins the nodes $$q\,{\text{and}}\, k$$ q and k passing through all the remaining nodes will result in a feasible TST, hence gives an upper bound on the TST. A simple procedure is outlined to identify: (1) the node $$p$$ p , (2) the two corresponding links $$\left( {p,q} \right)\,{\text{and}}\,\left( {p,k} \right),$$ p , q and p , k , and (3) the path joining the nodes $$q\,{\text{and}}\, k$$ q and k passing through all the remaining nodes. The approach is based on the minimum spanning tree; hence the complexity of the TST is reduced. The network in the present context has been assumed to be a connected network with at least two arcs emanating from each node.

Suggested Citation

  • Santosh Kumar & Elias Munapo & ‘Maseka Lesaoana & Philimon Nyamugure, 2018. "A minimum spanning tree based heuristic for the travelling salesman tour," OPSEARCH, Springer;Operational Research Society of India, vol. 55(1), pages 150-164, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:opsear:v:55:y:2018:i:1:d:10.1007_s12597-017-0318-5
    DOI: 10.1007/s12597-017-0318-5
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s12597-017-0318-5
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s12597-017-0318-5?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. WOLSEY, Laurence A., 1980. "Heuristic analysis, linear programming and branch and bound," LIDAM Reprints CORE 407, Université catholique de Louvain, Center for Operations Research and Econometrics (CORE).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Deeparnab Chakrabarty & Chaitanya Swamy, 2016. "Facility Location with Client Latencies: LP-Based Techniques for Minimum-Latency Problems," Mathematics of Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 41(3), pages 865-883, August.
    2. Geneviève Benoit & Sylvia Boyd, 2008. "Finding the Exact Integrality Gap for Small Traveling Salesman Problems," Mathematics of Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 33(4), pages 921-931, November.
    3. Freville, Arnaud, 2004. "The multidimensional 0-1 knapsack problem: An overview," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 155(1), pages 1-21, May.
    4. Mnich, Matthias & Mömke, Tobias, 2018. "Improved integrality gap upper bounds for traveling salesperson problems with distances one and two," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 266(2), pages 436-457.
    5. Sivakumar, Rathinam & Sengupta, Raja, 2007. "5/3-Approximation Algorithm for a Multiple Depot, Terminal Hamiltonian Path Problem," Institute of Transportation Studies, Research Reports, Working Papers, Proceedings qt3dw086dn, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Berkeley.
    6. Rathinam, Sivakumar & Sengupta, Raja, 2007. "3/2-Approximation Algorithm for a Generalized, Multiple Depot, Hamiltonina Path Problem," Institute of Transportation Studies, Research Reports, Working Papers, Proceedings qt06p2815q, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Berkeley.
    7. Moses Charikar & Michel X. Goemans & Howard Karloff, 2006. "On the Integrality Ratio for the Asymmetric Traveling Salesman Problem," Mathematics of Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 31(2), pages 245-252, May.
    8. Gábor Braun & Samuel Fiorini & Sebastian Pokutta & David Steurer, 2015. "Approximation Limits of Linear Programs (Beyond Hierarchies)," Mathematics of Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 40(3), pages 756-772, March.
    9. de Klerk, E. & Pasechnik, D.V. & Sotirov, R., 2007. "On Semidefinite Programming Relaxations of the Travelling Salesman Problem (Replaced by DP 2008-96)," Discussion Paper 2007-101, Tilburg University, Center for Economic Research.
    10. Alejandro Toriello & Nelson A. Uhan, 2013. "Technical Note---On Traveling Salesman Games with Asymmetric Costs," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 61(6), pages 1429-1434, December.
    11. Frans Schalekamp & David P. Williamson & Anke van Zuylen, 2014. "2-Matchings, the Traveling Salesman Problem, and the Subtour LP: A Proof of the Boyd-Carr Conjecture," Mathematics of Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 39(2), pages 403-417, May.
    12. de Klerk, E. & Pasechnik, D.V. & Sotirov, R., 2008. "On Semidefinite Programming Relaxations of the Traveling Salesman Problem (revision of DP 2007-101)," Discussion Paper 2008-96, Tilburg University, Center for Economic Research.
    13. Arnaud Fréville & SaÏd Hanafi, 2005. "The Multidimensional 0-1 Knapsack Problem—Bounds and Computational Aspects," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 139(1), pages 195-227, October.
    14. Huili Zhang & Yinfeng Xu, 2018. "Online covering salesman problem," Journal of Combinatorial Optimization, Springer, vol. 35(3), pages 941-954, April.
    15. Valenzuela, Christine L. & Jones, Antonia J., 1997. "Estimating the Held-Karp lower bound for the geometric TSP," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 102(1), pages 157-175, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:opsear:v:55:y:2018:i:1:d:10.1007_s12597-017-0318-5. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.