IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/opsear/v54y2017i2d10.1007_s12597-016-0282-5.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Hierarchical clustering of interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy relations and its application to elicit criteria weights in MCDM problems

Author

Listed:
  • Mamata Sahu

    (Delhi Technological University)

  • Anjana Gupta

    (Delhi Technological University)

  • Aparna Mehra

    (Indian Institute of Technology Delhi)

Abstract

The paper aims to apply the $$({\widetilde{\alpha }}, {\widetilde{\beta }})$$ ( α ~ , β ~ ) -cuts and the resolution form of the interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy (IVIF ) relations to develop a procedure for constructing a hierarchical clustering for IVIF max–min similarity relations. The advantage of the proposed scheme is illustrated in determining the criteria weights in multi-criteria decision making (MCDM) problems involving IVIF numbers. The problem of finding the criteria weights is of critical interest in the domain of MCDM problems . A complete procedure is drawn to generate criteria weights starting from the criteria-alternative matrix of the MCDM problem with entries provided by a decision maker as IVIF numbers .

Suggested Citation

  • Mamata Sahu & Anjana Gupta & Aparna Mehra, 2017. "Hierarchical clustering of interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy relations and its application to elicit criteria weights in MCDM problems," OPSEARCH, Springer;Operational Research Society of India, vol. 54(2), pages 388-416, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:opsear:v:54:y:2017:i:2:d:10.1007_s12597-016-0282-5
    DOI: 10.1007/s12597-016-0282-5
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s12597-016-0282-5
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s12597-016-0282-5?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jalao, Eugene Rex & Wu, Teresa & Shunk, Dan, 2014. "An intelligent decomposition of pairwise comparison matrices for large-scale decisions," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 238(1), pages 270-280.
    2. Lee, Hsuan-Shih, 1999. "Automatic clustering of business processes in business systems planning," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 114(2), pages 354-362, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Jiongmei Mo & Han-Liang Huang, 2019. "( T , S )-Based Single-Valued Neutrosophic Number Equivalence Matrix and Clustering Method," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 7(1), pages 1-16, January.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Liang, Gin-Shuh & Chou, Tsung-Yu & Han, Tzeu-Chen, 2005. "Cluster analysis based on fuzzy equivalence relation," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 166(1), pages 160-171, October.
    2. Wang, Qun & Jia, Guozhu & Song, Wenyan, 2022. "Identifying critical factors in systems with interrelated components: A method considering heterogeneous influence and strength attenuation," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 303(1), pages 456-470.
    3. Ja-Shen Chen & Russell K H Ching & Yi-Shen Lin, 2004. "An extended study of the K-means algorithm for data clustering and its applications," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 55(9), pages 976-987, September.
    4. Chao, Xiangrui & Kou, Gang & Li, Tie & Peng, Yi, 2018. "Jie Ke versus AlphaGo: A ranking approach using decision making method for large-scale data with incomplete information," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 265(1), pages 239-247.
    5. Marcin Anholcer & János Fülöp, 2019. "Deriving priorities from inconsistent PCM using network algorithms," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 274(1), pages 57-74, March.
    6. Kheybari, Siamak & Rezaie, Fariba Mahdi & Farazmand, Hadis, 2020. "Analytic network process: An overview of applications," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 367(C).
    7. Xia, Meimei & Chen, Jian, 2015. "Multi-criteria group decision making based on bilateral agreements," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 240(3), pages 756-764.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:opsear:v:54:y:2017:i:2:d:10.1007_s12597-016-0282-5. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.