IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/opmare/v11y2018i1d10.1007_s12063-018-0130-2.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Determining an optimal margin of error for supply chain audits

Author

Listed:
  • Scott M. Shafer

    (Wake Forest University)

Abstract

Unsaleables are products that need to be removed from the primary distribution channel for a variety of reasons including being damaged in the supply chain or reaching the end of their useful life before being sold. One approach for processing unsaleables is the development of Adjustable Rate Policies (ARP) whereby manufacturers establish reimbursement rates for damaged and expired product based on data collected from supply chain audits. A prerequisite for developing equitable reimbursement rates is the need for representative audits of the supply chain which in turn depend on the development of proper sampling plans. Given the need to obtain a representative sample in order to establish accurate reimbursement rates and critical flaws in the conventional sampling methodology, the purpose of this research is to propose a new methodology for determining the sample size for conducting supply chain audits and compare the proposed method to other methods. The results of the study consistently support the value of optimally determining the margin of error based on contextual factors such as sales volume, unit cost, and unit sampling costs.

Suggested Citation

  • Scott M. Shafer, 2018. "Determining an optimal margin of error for supply chain audits," Operations Management Research, Springer, vol. 11(1), pages 14-31, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:opmare:v:11:y:2018:i:1:d:10.1007_s12063-018-0130-2
    DOI: 10.1007/s12063-018-0130-2
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s12063-018-0130-2
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s12063-018-0130-2?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:opmare:v:11:y:2018:i:1:d:10.1007_s12063-018-0130-2. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.