Author
Abstract
Gutenberg and Richter developed an empirical relation, $$\log_{10} N(M) = a - bM$$ log 10 N ( M ) = a - b M , to quantify the seismicity rate of various magnitudes in a given region and time period. They found the equation fit observed data well both globally and for particular regions. In conventional G–R relation, N(M) represents an arithmetic mean. As a result, the arithmetic standard deviation cannot be explicitly incorporated in the log-linear G–R relation. Moreover, this representation is susceptible to influence of spuriously large numbers of aftershocks of major earthquake sequences. To overcome these shortcomings, we propose an alternative representation of the G–R relation in terms of the logarithmic mean annual seismicity rate and its standard deviation. We select the crustal earthquake data from 1973 to 2011, as listed in the National Earthquake Information Center (NEIC) global catalog and the Central Weather Bureau (CWB) Taiwan regional catalog, to illustrate our methodology. We first show that by using the logarithmic annual seismicity rates we can significantly suppress the influences of spuriously large numbers of aftershocks following major earthquake sequences contained in the Taiwan regional catalog. More significantly, both the logarithmic mean annual seismicity rate and its standard deviation can be explicitly represented in the Gutenberg–Richter relation as follows: $${\text{For}}\,{\text{global}}\,{\text{crustal}}\,{\text{seismicity}}{:}\;\log_{10} N = 8.14 - 1.03M \pm (0.04M - 0.13);$$ For global crustal seismicity : log 10 N = 8.14 - 1.03 M ± ( 0.04 M - 0.13 ) ; $${\text{For}}\,{\text{Taiwan}}\;{\text{crustal}}\,{\text{seismicity}}{:}\;\log_{10} N = 5.62 - 0.90M \pm (0.02M + 0.17)$$ For Taiwan crustal seismicity : log 10 N = 5.62 - 0.90 M ± ( 0.02 M + 0.17 ) where log10 N represents the logarithmic annual seismicity rate. Above analytical equations are very well constrained by observed global seismicity data with $$5.0 \le M \le 7.0$$ 5.0 ≤ M ≤ 7.0 and by Taiwan seismicity data with $$3.0 \le M \le 5.0$$ 3.0 ≤ M ≤ 5.0 . Both equations can be extrapolated with confidence to simultaneously estimate not only the median annual seismicity rates but also their uncertainties for large earthquakes for the first time since inception of the G–R relation. These equations can be used to improve the conventional probabilistic seismic hazard assessment by including the dispersion of the annual seismicity rate. Finally, the corresponding numerical median annual seismicity rate with its upper and lower bounds obtained from above equations for $$5.0 \le M \le 9.0$$ 5.0 ≤ M ≤ 9.0 is listed in Table 1. Table 1 Observed and estimated median annual seismicity rate and return period with their dispersions for Taiwan and global crustal earthquakes Magnitude Catalog Taiwan catalog (CWB) Taiwan catalog (CWB) Global catalog (NEIC) Global catalog (NEIC) Annual rate (event/year) Return period (year) Annual rate (event/year) Return period (year) M ≥ 5.0 24.55 13.18 7.08 0.041 0.076 0.14 1148.16 977.24 831.76 0.0009 0.001 0.0012 M ≥ 5.5 8.91 4.68 2.45 0.11 0.21 0.41 367.28 298.54 242.66 0.0027 0.0033 0.0041 M ≥ 6.0 3.24 1.66 0.85 0.31 0.60 1.18 117.49 91.20 70.79 0.0085 0.011 0.014 M ≥ 6.5 1.17 0.59 0.30 0.85 1.69 3.33 37.58 27.86 20.65 0.027 0.036 0.048 M ≥ 7.0 0.43 0.21 0.10 2.33 4.76 10.0 12.02 8.51 6.03 0.083 0.12 0.17 M ≥ 7.5 0.15 0.074 0.036 6.67 13.51 27.78 3.85 2.60 1.76 0.26 0.38 0.57 M ≥ 8.0 0.056 0.026 0.012 17.86 38.46 83.33 1.23 0.79 0.51 0.81 1.27 1.96 M ≥ 8.5 0.020 0.009 0.004 50.00 111.11 250.0 0.39 0.24 0.15 2.56 4.17 6.67 M ≥ 9.0 0.0074 0.0033 0.0015 135.14 303.03 666.67 0.13 0.074 0.04 7.69 13.51 25.00 Observed value is shown in bold number, estimated value in regular number $$\log_{10} N = 5.62 - 0.90M \pm (0.02M + 0.17)$$ log 10 N = 5.62 - 0.90 M ± ( 0.02 M + 0.17 ) for Taiwan crustal earthquakes $$\log_{10} N = 8.14 - 1.03M \pm (0.04M - 0.13)$$ log 10 N = 8.14 - 1.03 M ± ( 0.04 M - 0.13 ) for global crustal earthquakes
Suggested Citation
Wen-Yen Chang & Kuei-Pao Chen & Yi-Ben Tsai, 2017.
"Alternative representation of the Gutenberg–Richter relation in terms of the logarithmic mean annual seismicity rate and its standard deviation,"
Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 85(3), pages 1297-1322, February.
Handle:
RePEc:spr:nathaz:v:85:y:2017:i:3:d:10.1007_s11069-016-2577-5
DOI: 10.1007/s11069-016-2577-5
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:nathaz:v:85:y:2017:i:3:d:10.1007_s11069-016-2577-5. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.