Can Beijing fight with haze? Lessons can be learned from London and Los Angeles
Author
Abstract
Suggested Citation
DOI: 10.1007/s11069-014-1069-8
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version below or search for a different version of it.
Other versions of this item:
- Ke Wang & Yingnan Liu, 2014. "Can Beijing fight with haze? Lessons can be learned from London and Los Angeles," CEEP-BIT Working Papers 63, Center for Energy and Environmental Policy Research (CEEP), Beijing Institute of Technology.
Citations
Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
Cited by:
- Reeko Watanabe & Tsunemi Watanabe, 2020. "Does Haze Drive Pro-Environmental and Energy Conservation Behaviors? Evidence from the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei Area in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(23), pages 1-17, November.
- Xiaoyan Yu & Marin Marinov, 2020. "A Study on Recent Developments and Issues with Obstacle Detection Systems for Automated Vehicles," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-26, April.
- Jiuchang Wei & Weiwei Zhu & Dora Marinova & Fei Wang, 2017. "Household adoption of smog protective behavior: a comparison between two Chinese cities," Journal of Risk Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 20(7), pages 846-867, July.
- Jian Sun & Jinniu Wang & Yanqiang Wei & Yurui Li & Miao Liu, 2016. "The Haze Nightmare Following the Economic Boom in China: Dilemma and Tradeoffs," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-12, April.
- Dongyong Zhang & Junjuan Liu & Bingjun Li, 2014. "Tackling Air Pollution in China—What do We Learn from the Great Smog of 1950s in LONDON," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 6(8), pages 1-17, August.
- Dongwei Liu & Jilili Abuduwaili & Lixin Wang, 2015. "Salt dust storm in the Ebinur Lake region: its 50-year dynamic changes and response to climate changes and human activities," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 77(2), pages 1069-1080, June.
More about this item
JEL classification:
- Q40 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Energy - - - General
- Q58 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Environmental Economics - - - Environmental Economics: Government Policy
Statistics
Access and download statisticsCorrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:nathaz:v:72:y:2014:i:2:p:1265-1274. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.