IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/nathaz/v121y2025i5d10.1007_s11069-024-07024-y.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Empirical evaluation of windstorm losses and meteorological variables over the Netherlands

Author

Listed:
  • M. d. S. Fonseca Cerda

    (VU Amsterdam)

  • H. Moel

    (VU Amsterdam)

  • D. Ederen

    (VU Amsterdam
    Achmea)

  • J. C. J. H. Aerts

    (VU Amsterdam
    Deltares)

  • W. J. W. Botzen

    (VU Amsterdam)

  • T. Haer

    (VU Amsterdam)

Abstract

This study investigates windstorm impacts by combining high-resolution wind hazard data with a unique asset-level insurance loss dataset, specifically focusing on the Netherlands. We conduct statistical analyses to associate wind hazard characteristics with spatial data on windstorm losses at various spatial aggregation levels (four-digit to nationwide postal codes). Different wind hazard intensities (e.g. maximum wind gust, maximum hourly wind speed) are derived using meteorological data from 2017 to 2021 (the same period as the loss data). This data is based on station and downscaled ERA5 reanalysis data. Results show that the recorded gust has a good correlation with damage components (r = 0.41–0.61). The downscaled reanalysis data on gust and daily maximum (hourly mean) wind speed also have a good correlation (r = 0.38–0.59), albeit a bit smaller than the observed gust. When comparing different levels of aggregated data (PC4—four-digit postal code, PC2—two-digit postal code, and NL—national level), the correlation between claim and loss ratios becomes more pronounced as the level of aggregation increases. In addition, at the aggregated data level of two-digit postal codes, we see a wind speed threshold (around the 98th percentile of the records, ~ 22 m/s), where both losses and reported claims begin to rise as wind speed increases. Nevertheless, with lower wind speeds, damages and reported claims become meaningful using more aggregated data (NL). Our findings highlight the complex link between hazard and damage variables for windstorm losses, offering valuable insights for insurance portfolios, risk assessment, and management.

Suggested Citation

  • M. d. S. Fonseca Cerda & H. Moel & D. Ederen & J. C. J. H. Aerts & W. J. W. Botzen & T. Haer, 2025. "Empirical evaluation of windstorm losses and meteorological variables over the Netherlands," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 121(5), pages 6085-6106, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:nathaz:v:121:y:2025:i:5:d:10.1007_s11069-024-07024-y
    DOI: 10.1007/s11069-024-07024-y
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11069-024-07024-y
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11069-024-07024-y?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:nathaz:v:121:y:2025:i:5:d:10.1007_s11069-024-07024-y. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.