IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/nathaz/v121y2025i5d10.1007_s11069-024-07013-1.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Review of landslide inventories for Nepal between 2010 and 2021 reveals data gaps in global landslide hotspot

Author

Listed:
  • Erin L. Harvey

    (Durham University
    Durham University)

  • Mark E. Kincey

    (Newcastle University)

  • Nick J. Rosser

    (Durham University
    Durham University)

  • Arishma Gadtaula

    (National Society for Earthquake Technology)

  • Ethan Collins

    (Durham University)

  • Alexander L. Densmore

    (Durham University
    Durham University)

  • Alexandre Dunant

    (Durham University
    Durham University)

  • Katie J. Oven

    (Northumbria University)

  • Katherine Arrell

    (Northumbria University)

  • Gopi K. Basyal

    (National Society for Earthquake Technology)

  • Megh Raj Dhital

    (Tribhuvan University)

  • Tom R. Robinson

    (University of Canterbury)

  • Maximillian Van Wyk de Vries

    (University of Cambridge
    University of Cambridge)

  • Sarmila Paudyal

    (National Society for Earthquake Technology)

  • Dammar S. Pujara

    (National Society for Earthquake Technology)

  • Ram Shrestha

    (National Society for Earthquake Technology)

Abstract

A review of landslide inventories provides an essential assessment of the state of knowledge around landslide hazard and can guide the focus of future studies. This is especially true in Nepal, which is highly prone to landslides, but lacks a comprehensive overview of landslide occurrence nationally. Here, we compile a database of 117 landslide inventories for Nepal released between 2010 and 2021. We review how these existing inventories shape our understanding of landsliding in Nepal and discuss how future research efforts could mitigate current challenges. We find that 40% of the country was only manually mapped once across the study period, and, crucially, these areas did not always correspond with areas of low landslide susceptibility. Instead, existing landslide inventories typically focus on specific areas, such as the region affected by the 2015 Gorkha Earthquake and major highway corridors. We also extrapolated the individual inventory characteristics from within this unique database to infer a national-scale areal density of 0.05 landslides per km2, equating to 6000 landslides across the country. This extrapolated value provides a baseline for future national-scale studies, especially for inventories created through automated mapping approaches. Our review highlights the importance of expanding the footprint of landslide inventories in Nepal to include regions with low mapping coverage and the need for inventories to be openly available, with clear protocols to enable inter-comparison. Whilst our review has focused on Nepal, these findings are likely to be relevant in other landslide-prone countries and our recommendations are intended to be applicable elsewhere.

Suggested Citation

  • Erin L. Harvey & Mark E. Kincey & Nick J. Rosser & Arishma Gadtaula & Ethan Collins & Alexander L. Densmore & Alexandre Dunant & Katie J. Oven & Katherine Arrell & Gopi K. Basyal & Megh Raj Dhital & T, 2025. "Review of landslide inventories for Nepal between 2010 and 2021 reveals data gaps in global landslide hotspot," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 121(5), pages 5075-5101, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:nathaz:v:121:y:2025:i:5:d:10.1007_s11069-024-07013-1
    DOI: 10.1007/s11069-024-07013-1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11069-024-07013-1
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11069-024-07013-1?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:nathaz:v:121:y:2025:i:5:d:10.1007_s11069-024-07013-1. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.