Author
Listed:
- R. J. Fensham
(University of Queensland
Queensland Herbarium)
- A. Dowdy
(University of Melbourne)
- Z. C. Grice
(University of Queensland)
- B. Laffineur
(University of Queensland
Queensland Herbarium)
Abstract
Destructive bushfires which destroy buildings and inflict loss of human life regularly afflict the cities of the Australian east coast. A review of the incidence of destructive bushfires revealed their relative absence from Greater Brisbane compared to the other east coast capital cities of Sydney, Canberra, Melbourne and Hobart, despite all cities occurring in the forested eastern region of the continent. This study examines three factors that influence the incidence of destructive bushfires and attempts to assess the vulnerability of these Australian cities. The incidence of days with extreme Forest Fire Day Index (FFDI) values (> 50) was highest for Melbourne and lowest for Hobart. Wind directions on these extreme days was generally from inland areas where forest is associated with the urban fringe. Wet sclerophyll forest, which represents a substantial hazard, fringes parts of Melbourne and Hobart, while Brisbane and Canberra adjoin a higher proportion of cleared areas which alleviate the impact of destructive fires. Fine fuels decline from south to north and are thus highest in Hobart and lowest in Brisbane. The incidence of hazardous fires can be related to a composite of these three factors and indicate that Melbourne is most prone to destructive bushfires and Brisbane least prone. Climate change projections indicate that the incidence of extreme FFDI values will increase on the Australian east coast exaggerating the impact of destructive fires.
Suggested Citation
R. J. Fensham & A. Dowdy & Z. C. Grice & B. Laffineur, 2025.
"The fire environment of five Australian cities,"
Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 121(5), pages 5185-5205, March.
Handle:
RePEc:spr:nathaz:v:121:y:2025:i:5:d:10.1007_s11069-024-06975-6
DOI: 10.1007/s11069-024-06975-6
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:nathaz:v:121:y:2025:i:5:d:10.1007_s11069-024-06975-6. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.