Author
Listed:
- Junaid Aziz Khan
(National University of Sciences and Technology)
- Muhammad Qamar Javed Pirzada
(National University of Sciences and Technology)
- Muhammad Fahim Khokhar
(National University of Sciences and Technology)
Abstract
Glacial lake outburst floods (GLOFs) are climate change induced natural disasters that can damage lives, economy, and infrastructure. Globally, 15 million people are exposed to GLOFs, and one-third of this population is from Pakistan and India. In Pakistan, Shisper glacier is surging rapidly leading to formation of Shisper lake fed by meltwater of Mochuwar glacier. In this study, four hypothetical flow scenarios (100%, 75%, 50%, and 25%) based on empirical volume estimation of the lake, are hydrologically modeled using 2D unsteady flow analysis approach on HEC-RAS 6.5. Maximum flood inundation boundary, mean depth, velocity, and depth times velocity are computed and compared for all the scenarios. Flood inundation boundary was highest for 100% scenario (0.48 km2), followed by 75% (0.46 km2), 50% (0.43 km2), and 25% (0.39 km2). For all scenarios, flood extent covered the croplands, Hassanabad bridge, and Karakoram highway (KKH). Mean depth exceeded threshold value (0.35 m) in all scenarios, whereas threshold value for velocity i.e., 1.5 ms− 1 was exceeding in 100% (2.28 ms− 1), 75% (2.10 ms− 1), and 50% (1.85 ms− 1) flow scenarios. Depth * Velocity parameter which indicates the more realistic impact of flood highlighted that combined effect of depth and velocity is threatening in all scenarios i.e., exceeding the threshold value (0.52 m. m/s). Mean arrival time of the flood from Shisper lake to Hunza river was
Suggested Citation
Junaid Aziz Khan & Muhammad Qamar Javed Pirzada & Muhammad Fahim Khokhar, 2025.
"Scenario-based HEC-RAS 2D unsteady flow analysis of Shisper Lake for GLOF risk assessment,"
Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 121(4), pages 4759-4779, March.
Handle:
RePEc:spr:nathaz:v:121:y:2025:i:4:d:10.1007_s11069-024-06989-0
DOI: 10.1007/s11069-024-06989-0
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:nathaz:v:121:y:2025:i:4:d:10.1007_s11069-024-06989-0. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.