IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/nathaz/v121y2025i2d10.1007_s11069-024-06844-2.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Predicting landslide and debris flow susceptibility using Logitboost alternating decision trees and ensemble techniques

Author

Listed:
  • Cong Quan Nguyen

    (Vietnam Academy of Science and Technology)

  • Duc Anh Nguyen

    (Vietnam Academy of Science and Technology)

  • Hieu Trung Tran

    (Vietnam Academy of Science and Technology)

  • Thanh Trung Nguyen

    (Vietnam Academy of Science and Technology)

  • Bui Thi Phuong Thao

    (Vietnam Academy of Science and Technology)

  • Nguyen Tien Cong

    (Vietnam National Space Center, Vietnam Academy of Science and Technology)

  • Tran Phong

    (Vietnam Academy of Science and Technology
    Graduate University of Science and Technology, Vietnam Academy of Science and Technology)

  • Hiep Le

    (University of Transport Technology)

  • Indra Prakash

    (DDG (R) Geological Survey of India)

  • Binh Thai Pham

    (University of Transport Technology)

Abstract

Landslides are a global hazard that requires smart tools to identify the most vulnerable areas and to implement effective prevention and recovery plans. This study developed three ensemble models to assess the spatial susceptibility of landslides and debris flow in the Nam Pam commune of the Son La province, Vietnam. We applied the LogitBoost alternating decision trees (LADT) method as the base classifier and combined it with Bagging (B), Dagging (D), and MultiBoost (MBAB) ensemble techniques as ensemble techniques. We collected the locations of past landslides and debris flows from extensive field surveys and related them to sixteen variables that thought to influence landslide and debris flow occurrence to examine the spatial distribution of landslide and debris flow susceptibility in the study area. The models were evaluated based on the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) and other evaluation criteria, such as positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), sensitivity (SST), specificity (SPF), accuracy (ACC), Kappa, and root mean square error (RMSE). The results showed that the B-LADT model was the best model, with AUC = 0.9, PPV = 86%, NPV = 82%, SST = 83%, SPF = 86%, ACC = 85%, RMSE = 0.36, and Kappa = 0.69. According to this model, about 17% of the study area had high and very high landslide and debris flow susceptibility levels. These regions were mainly associated with the variations in weathering crust, elevation, fault density, and lithology of the study area. The study demonstrates the effectiveness of ensemble learning techniques in creating reliable prediction models, which can help save lives and reduce infrastructure damage in landslide- or debris flow-affected regions worldwide.

Suggested Citation

  • Cong Quan Nguyen & Duc Anh Nguyen & Hieu Trung Tran & Thanh Trung Nguyen & Bui Thi Phuong Thao & Nguyen Tien Cong & Tran Phong & Hiep Le & Indra Prakash & Binh Thai Pham, 2025. "Predicting landslide and debris flow susceptibility using Logitboost alternating decision trees and ensemble techniques," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 121(2), pages 1661-1686, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:nathaz:v:121:y:2025:i:2:d:10.1007_s11069-024-06844-2
    DOI: 10.1007/s11069-024-06844-2
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11069-024-06844-2
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11069-024-06844-2?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:nathaz:v:121:y:2025:i:2:d:10.1007_s11069-024-06844-2. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.