IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/nathaz/v121y2025i2d10.1007_s11069-024-06795-8.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

New rulers for estimating the magnitude of catastrophic debris flows

Author

Listed:
  • Taixin Peng

    (School of Geosciences, Yangtze University
    State Key Laboratory of Mountain Hazards and Engineering Resilience, Institute of Mountain Hazards and Environment, Chinese Academy of Sciences)

  • Ningsheng Chen

    (School of Geosciences, Yangtze University
    State Key Laboratory of Mountain Hazards and Engineering Resilience, Institute of Mountain Hazards and Environment, Chinese Academy of Sciences
    Academy of Plateau Science and Sustainability
    Chinese Academy of Sciences-Tribhuvan University)

  • Guisheng Hu

    (State Key Laboratory of Mountain Hazards and Engineering Resilience, Institute of Mountain Hazards and Environment, Chinese Academy of Sciences
    Academy of Plateau Science and Sustainability)

  • Shufeng Tian

    (State Key Laboratory of Mountain Hazards and Engineering Resilience, Institute of Mountain Hazards and Environment, Chinese Academy of Sciences)

  • Huayong Ni

    (Chinese Academy of Geological Sciences)

  • Ling Huang

    (Chinese Academy of Geological Sciences)

Abstract

On July 25, 2020, at 05:25, a catastrophic debris flow occurred in the Keke gully, southwest China, causing a loss of ~ $5,000,000. To provide a basis for research and check-dam construction, accurately estimate debris-flow magnitude is essential. Field investigation revealed that the debris flow left massive boulders and continuous mud traces in the narrow gully. However, efficiently extracting data from these boulders and mud traces and translating it into the magnitude of debris flows remains challenging. Here, we present an executable framework called the "ruler" to estimate debris-flow magnitude, utilizing DJ Magic4, AgiSoft, Rhino, ArcGIS, and Pycharm. Extracting 408 boulders and 3582 sections from a digital orthophoto map and digital elevation model of a 7-km gully. Establishing a boulder-based velocity and cross-section-based discharge ruler based on the modified manning's formula and empirical hydrodynamic formula. This ruler was cross-referenced and validated against traditional field investigation methods. The estimation results show that the Keke gully debris flow was a significantly large and dilute debris-flow event; the peak discharge was ~ 842 m3/s, the total volume was ~ 3,440,000 m3, and the total volume of the deposit was ~ 127,000 m3. Our rulers addressed the lack of debris-flow magnitude data records, particularly in areas where accumulation fans are not obvious or observations are limited. The intelligent historical debris-flow magnitude estimation proposed in this study allows for more efficient debris-flow prevention and control, thereby reducing the damage caused by such events.

Suggested Citation

  • Taixin Peng & Ningsheng Chen & Guisheng Hu & Shufeng Tian & Huayong Ni & Ling Huang, 2025. "New rulers for estimating the magnitude of catastrophic debris flows," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 121(2), pages 1765-1778, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:nathaz:v:121:y:2025:i:2:d:10.1007_s11069-024-06795-8
    DOI: 10.1007/s11069-024-06795-8
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11069-024-06795-8
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11069-024-06795-8?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:nathaz:v:121:y:2025:i:2:d:10.1007_s11069-024-06795-8. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.