IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/nathaz/v121y2025i1d10.1007_s11069-024-06788-7.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Floodplains along the Danube River evaluated with the Floodplain Evaluation Matrix (FEM) determining their importance for flood protection, ecology, and socio-economics

Author

Listed:
  • Markus Eder

    (BOKU University)

  • Helmut Habersack

    (BOKU University)

  • Max Preiml

    (BOKU University)

  • Francesca Perosa

    (Technical University of Munich)

  • Sabrina Scheuer

    (BOKU University)

  • Marion Gelhaus

    (Catholic University of Eichstaett-Ingolstadt)

  • Bernd Cyffka

    (Catholic University of Eichstaett-Ingolstadt)

  • Timea Kiss

    (University of Szeged)

  • Boudewijn Leeuwen

    (University of Szeged)

  • Zalán Tobak

    (University of Szeged)

  • György Sipos

    (University of Szeged)

  • Nándor Csikos

    (Institute for Soil Sciences)

  • Anna Smetanova

    (Global Water Partnership Central and Eastern Europe)

  • Sabina Bokal

    (Global Water Partnership Central and Eastern Europe)

  • Andrea Samu

    (WWF Hungary)

  • Tamas Gruber

    (WWF Hungary)

  • Andreea-Cristina Galie

    (National Institute of Hydrology and Water Management)

  • Marinela Moldovenau

    (National Institute of Hydrology and Water Management)

  • Petrişor Mazilu

    (National Administration “Romanian Waters”)

  • Michael Tritthart

    (BOKU University)

Abstract

This study presents a method to investigate the influence of active floodplains on flood protection, ecology, and socio-economics. We used and further developed the Floodplain Evaluation Matrix (FEM) to systematically assess the Danube River, known as the most international river worldwide. The study also aims to develop a method applicable to other large rivers, taking into account different data availability and research objectives. Hydrological, hydraulic, ecological, and socio-economic parameters were assessed to address the multiple functions and services of floodplains. The evaluation showed that some active floodplains significantly reduce the impact of a 100-year flood event, with relative flood peak reductions by up to 17% and decelerating the flood wave by up to 41.5 h. While other floodplains may not have a noticeable impact on hydrological or hydraulic parameters, they play a crucial role in preserving biodiversity by providing essential habitats for protected species. We introduced an approach to assess whether a floodplain should be preserved and to categorize the restoration demand as low, medium, or high. Our findings indicate a universal need for preservation and restoration measures across all floodplains, with 81% demonstrating a high or medium demand for restoration. Preservation and restoration of floodplains are integral parts of achieving more sustainable floodplain management for each river. Applying the FEM to other large rivers could create a basis for sustainable decision-making, increase awareness of the multiple benefits of floodplains, and foster the implementation of preservation and restoration measures.

Suggested Citation

  • Markus Eder & Helmut Habersack & Max Preiml & Francesca Perosa & Sabrina Scheuer & Marion Gelhaus & Bernd Cyffka & Timea Kiss & Boudewijn Leeuwen & Zalán Tobak & György Sipos & Nándor Csikos & Anna Sm, 2025. "Floodplains along the Danube River evaluated with the Floodplain Evaluation Matrix (FEM) determining their importance for flood protection, ecology, and socio-economics," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 121(1), pages 623-660, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:nathaz:v:121:y:2025:i:1:d:10.1007_s11069-024-06788-7
    DOI: 10.1007/s11069-024-06788-7
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11069-024-06788-7
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11069-024-06788-7?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:nathaz:v:121:y:2025:i:1:d:10.1007_s11069-024-06788-7. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.