IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/nathaz/v117y2023i3d10.1007_s11069-023-05985-0.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Engineering geological investigation and runout modelling of the disastrous Taliye landslide, Maharashtra, India of 22 July 2021

Author

Listed:
  • Bipin Peethambaran

    (Government of India)

  • V. Nandakumar

    (Government of India)

  • Kumari Sweta

    (Indian Institute of Technology Roorkee)

Abstract

The Taliye landslide, a hill slope debris flow, is one of the recent large-scale landslides in India in terms of mortality and socio-economic predicaments. In general, the Taliye area exhibits a moderately dissected plateau relief, and the landslide was initiated from a north-westerly slope of a west trending major ridge and flowed through a paddy field to bury houses located just below it. The landslide had a total runout of 563 m and maximum width of 230 m at the toe. The heavy rainfall and presence of a narrow stream may be the prime triggering factors, but the affected area had also been exposed to human interference for farming as well as for habitation. Given its socio-economic relevance and landslide proneness of this area, a post-event engineering geological investigation and numerical modelling of this landslide have been carried out to have a closer look at its type, causes of failure, back calculation of run-out characteristics, as well as to calibrate frictional parameters for this area. The numerical modelling package, rapid mass movements (RAMMS) was used to undertake back analysis of this debris flow by referring the original flow shape. For the precise preference of Voellmy frictional parameters, dry-Coulomb friction (µ) and viscous-turbulent friction (ξ) coefficients, this study applies the popular receiver operative characteristics (ROC) technique as the model validation tool. The landslide may have initiated as a talus or translational failure of shallow soil on the hillock, but later might have transformed into a debris flow by entraining materials from the paddy field. Amongst the different combinations of frictional parameters, the model with µ of 0.06 m/s2 and ξ of 1450 m/s2 has emerged as the best with an area under the curve (AUC) value of 0.883 for the ROC assessment. With these calibrated frictional parameters, the maximum flow velocity of this debris flow was simulated to be in the order of 5.26 m/s taking place at the middle reaches, and the maximum flow velocity and pressure were derived as 21 m/s and 0.92 kPa, respectively, concentrated in the hillock zone. Although it was a rain-induced failure, the investigation suggests that improper slope management practices might have amplified its magnitude and got manifested as devastating landslide. Therefore, human activities in these hilly regions shall be supported with systematic landslide hazard evaluation, and here in this case, the calibrated frictional parameters may be useful for debris flow modelling and landslide risk reduction in the area.

Suggested Citation

  • Bipin Peethambaran & V. Nandakumar & Kumari Sweta, 2023. "Engineering geological investigation and runout modelling of the disastrous Taliye landslide, Maharashtra, India of 22 July 2021," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 117(3), pages 3257-3272, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:nathaz:v:117:y:2023:i:3:d:10.1007_s11069-023-05985-0
    DOI: 10.1007/s11069-023-05985-0
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11069-023-05985-0
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11069-023-05985-0?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:nathaz:v:117:y:2023:i:3:d:10.1007_s11069-023-05985-0. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.