Author
Abstract
Gully erosion studies are usually complex and expensive due to the multiple nature of the causative factors, heterogeneity of the underlying geologic materials, and the high volume of point source data required within a given area. For this reason, thorough gully erosion studies are rarely carried out, especially in developing countries with few resources allocated to environmental studies. Thus, it becomes difficult in solving problems arising from such a geologic hazard in those areas. However, the availability of data emanating from remotely sensed operations can be utilized in solving complex gully erosion problems using modern geospatial analytical tools. Consequently, a gully erosion susceptibility study was carried out in Anambra State, Southeastern Nigeria, by integrating remotely acquired geomorphologic and environmental data with the geotechnical information that was derived from field and laboratory investigations. The integrated geomorphologic, environmental, and geotechnical data were analysed with analytical tools such as ArcGIS, Google Earth, and Microsoft Excel, following the frequency ratio method. Results from the study revealed that slope angle, soil plasticity, angle of internal friction, cohesion, and population density contributed about 20%, 23%, 20%, 18%, and 9%, respectively, to soil’s susceptibility to gullying. Slope angle positively correlated with the frequency of gully erosion, whereas population density, plasticity, cohesion, and angle of internal friction negatively correlated with the frequency of gully erosion. The spatial distribution of the data revealed areas that are susceptible to gullying in their various degrees, thus providing affordable information for proper environmental planning and development.
Suggested Citation
Chukwuebuka Emeh & Ogbonnaya Igwe & Tochukwu A. S. Ugwoke, 2023.
"Geospatial analysis of factors driving gully erosion: a case study from Southeastern Nigeria,"
Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 117(3), pages 2903-2933, July.
Handle:
RePEc:spr:nathaz:v:117:y:2023:i:3:d:10.1007_s11069-023-05971-6
DOI: 10.1007/s11069-023-05971-6
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:nathaz:v:117:y:2023:i:3:d:10.1007_s11069-023-05971-6. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.