IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/nathaz/v104y2020i2d10.1007_s11069-020-04242-y.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Using mixing model to interpret the water sources and ratios in an under-sea mine

Author

Listed:
  • Hongyu Gu

    (Chengdu Center, China Geological Survey)

  • Huayong Ni

    (Nanjing Center, China Geological Survey)

  • Fengshan Ma

    (Institute of Geology and Geophysics, Chinese Academy of Sciences)

  • Gang Liu

    (Xian Center, China Geological Survey)

  • Xin Hui

    (Beijing Jingtou Urban Utility Tunnel Investment Co., Ltd
    Beijing Infrastructure Investment Co., Ltd)

  • Jiayuan Cao

    (China Merchants Chongqing Communications Research and Design Institute Co., Ltd
    Institute of Geology and Geophysics, Chinese Academy of Sciences)

Abstract

Identification of water sources is a key issue of water inrush. This study applied a mixing model based on hydrochemical data to identify water sources and proportions. This study highlighted (1) the importance of model scale and reaction evaluation before using the mixing model, (2) a newly proposed criterion based on eigenvalue analysis to identify the number of end-members, and (3) linear mixing model based on PCA (principal component analysis). 2.5 km2 area was an appropriate scale to mixing model because tectonics and lithology were simple. Ion activity, ion exchange, and cycle time of water were evaluated, indicating that groundwater components were dominated by the mixing process. Tracers, such as K, Na, Ca, Mg, Cl, SO4, δ18O, δD, EC, TH, and TDS, were used as tracers in the mixing model. Five end-members (representing seawater, Quaternary water, freshwater, Ca-rich water, and Mg-rich water) were identified based on eigenvalue analysis and hydrochemical evolution analysis. A linear mixing algorithm was programmed using Matlab to compute the ratio of each end-member. The results showed that seawater was the dominated water sources (70% at most) threatening the mining operations, especially at the deep levels. Quaternary water mainly recharged the middle level and made up 50% at − 420 m level. Freshwater recharged the shallow level and made up to 40% at − 150 m level. Ca-rich water and Mg-rich water decreased with time. Finally, cross test and extension test of this method showed a high precision in reconstructing ion concentrations, low sensitivity to noise data, and highly extendible to future data.

Suggested Citation

  • Hongyu Gu & Huayong Ni & Fengshan Ma & Gang Liu & Xin Hui & Jiayuan Cao, 2020. "Using mixing model to interpret the water sources and ratios in an under-sea mine," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 104(2), pages 1705-1722, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:nathaz:v:104:y:2020:i:2:d:10.1007_s11069-020-04242-y
    DOI: 10.1007/s11069-020-04242-y
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11069-020-04242-y
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11069-020-04242-y?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Luwang Chen & Xiaoxi Yin & Wenpin Xie & Xiaoqing Feng, 2014. "Calculating groundwater mixing ratios in groundwater-inrushing aquifers based on environmental stable isotopes (D, 18 O) and hydrogeochemistry," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 71(1), pages 937-953, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.

      Corrections

      All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:nathaz:v:104:y:2020:i:2:d:10.1007_s11069-020-04242-y. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

      If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

      If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

      If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

      For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

      Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

      IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.