IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/nathaz/v104y2020i1d10.1007_s11069-020-04177-4.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An evaluation of the performance of rock fall protection measures and their role in hazard zoning

Author

Listed:
  • Camille-Jean Jaccard

    (University of Applied Sciences and Arts Western Switzerland (HES-SO)
    Stucki Ltd)

  • Jacopo Maria Abbruzzese

    (University of Applied Sciences and Arts Western Switzerland (HES-SO))

  • Erika Prina Howald

    (University of Applied Sciences and Arts Western Switzerland (HES-SO))

Abstract

Rock falls threaten human lives and assets in mountainous regions all over the world. Protection measures are one of the most effective solutions for mitigating rock fall-related hazards and risks; however, their optimal working conditions must be ensured throughout their whole life span, in order for the measures to play their role properly and not to have their performance compromised. This paper presents a methodology for a simple yet effective evaluation of the performance of existing rock fall protections, whose goal is to establish their actual performance capacity and, based on that, whether they can play their mitigation role. The methodology is articulated into four main steps. In the first, data and information about the hazard affecting a site, the current state of existing protections and possible faults/causes of malfunctioning of the protections are collected. The second and third steps evaluate the actual performance capacity of the protections in comparison with their nominal capacity, after the potential influence of the factors degrading the effectiveness, detected in the first step, is considered (i.e. factors reflecting negative interaction between site and measures, structural design issues of the protections, faults and malfunctioning due to lack of maintenance, etc.). These three steps were implemented in a spreadsheet tool, allowing to store relevant data on protection measures collected during a field survey and to perform the evaluation analysis directly on site, semi-automatically, based on the data collected. Finally, once an actual performance capacity is obtained from these evaluations, the last step of the methodology is to compare this capacity to the hazard at the site, in terms of energy and return period of the events at each location of interest, to establish whether the protections can in fact mitigate such hazard or need intervention (reparations, replacement, etc.). A detailed application of the whole procedure is shown, by means of a demonstrative example carried out at a Swiss site where rock fall protections measures were previously installed and hazard zoning maps are available.

Suggested Citation

  • Camille-Jean Jaccard & Jacopo Maria Abbruzzese & Erika Prina Howald, 2020. "An evaluation of the performance of rock fall protection measures and their role in hazard zoning," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 104(1), pages 459-491, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:nathaz:v:104:y:2020:i:1:d:10.1007_s11069-020-04177-4
    DOI: 10.1007/s11069-020-04177-4
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11069-020-04177-4
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11069-020-04177-4?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jordi Corominas & Ramon Copons & Joan Vilaplana & Joan Altimir & Jordi Amigó, 2003. "Integrated Landslide Susceptibility Analysis and Hazard Assessment in the Principality of Andorra," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 30(3), pages 421-435, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Raquel Melo & José Luís Zêzere, 2017. "Modeling debris flow initiation and run-out in recently burned areas using data-driven methods," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 88(3), pages 1373-1407, September.
    2. Gao Hua-xi & Yin Kun-long, 2014. "Study on spatial prediction and time forecast of landslide," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 70(3), pages 1735-1748, February.
    3. Paolo Magliulo & Antonio Di Lisio & Filippo Russo & Antonio Zelano, 2008. "Geomorphology and landslide susceptibility assessment using GIS and bivariate statistics: a case study in southern Italy," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 47(3), pages 411-435, December.
    4. Luca Maria Falconi & Lorenzo Moretti & Claudio Puglisi & Gaia Righini, 2023. "Debris and mud flows runout assessment: a comparison among empirical geometric equations in the Giampilieri and Briga basins (east Sicily, Italy) affected by the event of October 1, 2009," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 117(3), pages 2347-2373, July.
    5. Silvana Moragues & María Gabriela Lenzano & Mario Lanfri & Stella Moreiras & Esteban Lannutti & Luis Lenzano, 2021. "Analytic hierarchy process applied to landslide susceptibility mapping of the North Branch of Argentino Lake, Argentina," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 105(1), pages 915-941, January.
    6. Dimitris Kouhartsiouk & Skevi Perdikou, 2021. "The application of DInSAR and Bayesian statistics for the assessment of landslide susceptibility," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 105(3), pages 2957-2985, February.
    7. A. Clerici & S. Perego & C. Tellini & P. Vescovi, 2010. "Landslide failure and runout susceptibility in the upper T. Ceno valley (Northern Apennines, Italy)," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 52(1), pages 1-29, January.
    8. Martin Mergili & Wolfgang Fellin & Stella Moreiras & Johann Stötter, 2012. "Simulation of debris flows in the Central Andes based on Open Source GIS: possibilities, limitations, and parameter sensitivity," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 61(3), pages 1051-1081, April.
    9. Norbert Simon & Rodeano Roslee & Goh Thian Lai, 2017. "Temporal Landslide Susceptibility Assessment Using Landslide Density Technique," Geological Behavior (GBR), Zibeline International Publishing, vol. 1(2), pages 10-13, January.
    10. Gökçe Hasekioğulları & Murat Ercanoglu, 2012. "A new approach to use AHP in landslide susceptibility mapping: a case study at Yenice (Karabuk, NW Turkey)," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 63(2), pages 1157-1179, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:nathaz:v:104:y:2020:i:1:d:10.1007_s11069-020-04177-4. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.