IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/nathaz/v103y2020i3d10.1007_s11069-020-04098-2.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Enhancing community engagement in disaster early warning system in Aceh, Indonesia: opportunities and challenges

Author

Listed:
  • Sofyan Sufri

    (Griffith University)

  • Febi Dwirahmadi

    (Griffith University
    Centre for Environment and Population Health, Griffith University)

  • Dung Phung

    (Griffith University
    Centre for Environment and Population Health, Griffith University)

  • Shannon Rutherford

    (Griffith University)

Abstract

Engaging communities in Early Warning Systems (EWSs) is crucial to save lives, reduce injuries, and protect the environment due to disaster events. Yet, community input is not always commonly sought in many disaster policy development and implementation processes. Following the major disaster event of 2004 that had large consequences for multiple countries, the concept of people-centred EWSs was promulgated to encourage Community Engagement (CE) in EWSs. Aceh, Indonesia was one of the regions most devastated by the 2004 event, and despite the progress that has been achieved in disaster risk management and prevention and preparedness including the EWS design and operation following this event, improving CE in the system remains an important challenge. This study investigates the opportunities and challenges for enhancing CE in the EWS in Aceh by exploring current social systems, governance arrangements, donor funded projects and community perspectives using in-depth interviews, document reviews, and focus group discussions. The findings identify that there is inadequate CE across all four elements of a people-centred EWS. To enhance such CE in the EWS, numerous opportunities were identified: improved recognition of community figures, promoting adat and sharia practices in enhancing community involvement; and utility of meunasahs and mosques as important physical places for engaging the community in the system. Despite these opportunities, various barriers were identified to improve CE including insufficient integration of CE in the formal EWS contingency plans or the existing EWS SOP; the erosion of meuseraya practices; inadequate funds to maintain CE programs; insufficient sustained integration of CE into government disaster policy processes; lack of community ownership of CE programs; and a fatalistic worldview of disasters. Various recommendations are provided to enhance CE in the EWS in Aceh. This is a critical requirement towards reducing harm for future hazard events.

Suggested Citation

  • Sofyan Sufri & Febi Dwirahmadi & Dung Phung & Shannon Rutherford, 2020. "Enhancing community engagement in disaster early warning system in Aceh, Indonesia: opportunities and challenges," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 103(3), pages 2691-2709, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:nathaz:v:103:y:2020:i:3:d:10.1007_s11069-020-04098-2
    DOI: 10.1007/s11069-020-04098-2
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11069-020-04098-2
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11069-020-04098-2?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Eversole, Robyn, 2011. "Community Agency and Community Engagement: Re-theorising Participation in Governance," Journal of Public Policy, Cambridge University Press, vol. 31(1), pages 51-71, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Kamran Shafique & Cle-Anne Gabriel, 2022. "Vulnerable Stakeholders’ Engagement: Advancing Stakeholder Theory with New Attribute and Salience Framework," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(18), pages 1-19, September.
    2. Shi-yu Hu & Miao Yu & Ting Que & Gang Fan & Hui-ge Xing, 2022. "Individual willingness to prepare for disasters in a geological hazard risk area: an empirical study based on the protection motivation theory," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 110(3), pages 2087-2111, February.
    3. Kim A. Johnston & Maureen Taylor & Barbara Ryan, 2022. "Engaging communities to prepare for natural hazards: a conceptual model," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 112(3), pages 2831-2851, July.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Chris Hastie, 2021. "The Perpetuation of Inequality: The Role of Community Engagement," Sociological Research Online, , vol. 26(3), pages 759-767, September.
    2. Haugh, Helen M., 2021. "The governance of entrepreneurial community ventures: How do conflicting community interests influence opportunity exploitation?," Journal of Business Venturing Insights, Elsevier, vol. 16(C).
    3. Gianluigi Guido & Christian Rizzo & M. Irene Prete & Annamaria Cazzar? & Giovanni Pino, 2016. "Network analysis of local territorial systems in the Salento region, Italy," RIVISTA DI STUDI SULLA SOSTENIBILITA', FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2016(1), pages 83-101.
    4. Mark Fabian & Anna Alexandrova & Yamini Cinamon Nair, 2023. "Coproducing Wellbeing Policy: A Theory of Thriving in Financial Hardship," Journal of Happiness Studies, Springer, vol. 24(7), pages 2309-2330, October.
    5. Mauerhofer, Volker, 2016. "Public participation in environmental matters: Compendium, challenges and chances globally," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 52(C), pages 481-491.
    6. Simon Peter Muwafu & Lena Rölfer & Jürgen Scheffran & María Máñez Costa, 2024. "A framework for assessing social structure in community governance of sustainable urban drainage systems: insights from a literature review," Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, Springer, vol. 29(5), pages 1-19, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:nathaz:v:103:y:2020:i:3:d:10.1007_s11069-020-04098-2. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.