Author
Listed:
- Hesam Dehghani
(Hamedan University of Technology)
- Reza Sakinezhad
(Hamedan University of Technology)
- Zohre Nabavi
(Tarbiat Modares University)
- Nima Babanouri
(Hamedan University of Technology)
Abstract
The growing demand for primary mineral resources and the finite nature of mineral reserves necessitate their efficient utilization while minimizing losses. To extend mine life and increase economic reserves, transitioning from open-pit to underground mining has proven to be a viable strategy. Identifying this critical transition depth is pivotal, as it significantly impacts mining profitability. Therefore, in this paper we propose a method to determine the open-pit/underground transition depth based on an economic block model, accounting for the final pit limit and considering the inherent uncertainty in mineral prices. To achieve our research aim, a hypothetical grade model was constructed initially, and we used @Risk software to perform Monte Carlo simulation of copper prices based on historical data. By generating 200 different mineral price scenarios, we created 200 economic block models. Subsequently, nine mining sequences were designed, and seven distinct scenarios were established to ascertain the final open-pit limit and the depth of the transition point between mining methods, contingent on fluctuating mineral prices. Based on the outcomes derived from the seven scenarios, the depth at which the mining method transition from open-pit to underground is recommended to be 375 m from the surface, under the aforementioned uncertainties. This recommendation is based on the cumulative net present value of open-pit/underground mining, as illustrated in scenario number 7. Our findings provide valuable insights for mining companies seeking to optimize resource utilization and maximize profitability while navigating uncertain mineral price environments.
Suggested Citation
Hesam Dehghani & Reza Sakinezhad & Zohre Nabavi & Nima Babanouri, 2024.
"Incorporation price uncertainty into open-pit to underground mine transition,"
Mineral Economics, Springer;Raw Materials Group (RMG);Luleå University of Technology, vol. 37(1), pages 89-99, March.
Handle:
RePEc:spr:minecn:v:37:y:2024:i:1:d:10.1007_s13563-023-00408-9
DOI: 10.1007/s13563-023-00408-9
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:minecn:v:37:y:2024:i:1:d:10.1007_s13563-023-00408-9. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.