IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/metrik/v81y2018i8d10.1007_s00184-018-0661-4.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Efficiency comparison of the Wilcoxon tests in paired and independent survey samples

Author

Listed:
  • Ludwig Baringhaus

    (Leibniz Universität Hannover)

  • Daniel Gaigall

    (Leibniz Universität Hannover)

Abstract

The efficiency concepts of Bahadur and Pitman are used to compare the Wilcoxon tests in paired and independent survey samples. A comparison through the length of corresponding confidence intervals is also done. Simple conditions characterizing the dominance of a procedure are derived. Statistical tests for checking these conditions are suggested and discussed.

Suggested Citation

  • Ludwig Baringhaus & Daniel Gaigall, 2018. "Efficiency comparison of the Wilcoxon tests in paired and independent survey samples," Metrika: International Journal for Theoretical and Applied Statistics, Springer, vol. 81(8), pages 891-930, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:metrik:v:81:y:2018:i:8:d:10.1007_s00184-018-0661-4
    DOI: 10.1007/s00184-018-0661-4
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00184-018-0661-4
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s00184-018-0661-4?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. P. Groeneboom & J. Oosterhoff, 1977. "Bahadur efficiency and probabilities of large deviations," Statistica Neerlandica, Netherlands Society for Statistics and Operations Research, vol. 31(1), pages 1-24, March.
    2. Baringhaus, Ludwig & Gaigall, Daniel, 2017. "Hotelling’s T2 tests in paired and independent survey samples: An efficiency comparison," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 154(C), pages 177-198.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. José A. Sáez & José L. Romero-Béjar, 2022. "On the Suitability of Bagging-Based Ensembles with Borderline Label Noise," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-14, June.
    2. José A. Sáez & José L. Romero-Béjar, 2022. "Impact of Regressand Stratification in Dataset Shift Caused by Cross-Validation," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(14), pages 1-14, July.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Pycke, Jean-Renaud, 2021. "A new family of omega-square-type statistics with Bahadur local optimality for the location family of generalized logistic distributions," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 170(C).
    2. Baringhaus, Ludwig & Gaigall, Daniel, 2017. "Hotelling’s T2 tests in paired and independent survey samples: An efficiency comparison," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 154(C), pages 177-198.
    3. T. Ramallingam, 1990. "Exact bahadur efficiencies of tests for superadditivity of the mean function of a non-homogeneous poisson process," Metrika: International Journal for Theoretical and Applied Statistics, Springer, vol. 37(1), pages 129-143, December.
    4. E. Kremer, 1982. "Local comparison of linear rank tests, in the Bahadur sense," Metrika: International Journal for Theoretical and Applied Statistics, Springer, vol. 29(1), pages 159-173, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:metrik:v:81:y:2018:i:8:d:10.1007_s00184-018-0661-4. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.