IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/metrik/v18y2007i2p133-159.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Performancemessung und Wertgenerierung: Entlohnung auf Basis des Residualen Ökonomischen Gewinns

Author

Listed:
  • Wolfgang Schultze
  • Andreas Weiler

Abstract

Value based performance measures are intended to capture increases in shareholder wealth. At the same time they have to measure the realization of the returns initially planned for. To provide incentives for management to act in the interest of owners, bonus payments are often based on these performance measures. Goal congruent performance measurement systems are mostly sought for in the literature using residual income and specific rules for the determination of profit. In this paper we argue that this can be achieved by a specific performance measure and its combinations with the concept of a bonus bank. Copyright Springer-Verlag 2007

Suggested Citation

  • Wolfgang Schultze & Andreas Weiler, 2007. "Performancemessung und Wertgenerierung: Entlohnung auf Basis des Residualen Ökonomischen Gewinns," Metrika: International Journal for Theoretical and Applied Statistics, Springer, vol. 18(2), pages 133-159, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:metrik:v:18:y:2007:i:2:p:133-159
    DOI: 10.1007/s00187-007-0026-z
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1007/s00187-007-0026-z
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s00187-007-0026-z?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Reichelstein, S, 2000. "Providing managerial incentives: Cash flows versus accrual accounting," Journal of Accounting Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 38(2), pages 243-269.
    2. G. Bennett Stewart, 2003. "How To Fix Accounting—Measure And Report Economic Profit," Journal of Applied Corporate Finance, Morgan Stanley, vol. 15(3), pages 63-82, March.
    3. Wolfgang Schultze, 2005. "The Information Content of Goodwill-Impairments under FAS 142: Implications for External Analysis and Internal Control," Schmalenbach Business Review (sbr), LMU Munich School of Management, vol. 57(3), pages 276-297, July.
    4. Andreas Haaker, 2007. "Wertorientierte Kontrolle und Abweichungsanalyse auf Basis des Goodwill-Impairment-Tests nach IFRS," Metrika: International Journal for Theoretical and Applied Statistics, Springer, vol. 18(1), pages 83-108, April.
    5. Alfred Wagenhofer, 2003. "Accrual-based compensation, depreciation and investment decisions," European Accounting Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 12(2), pages 287-309.
    6. Lambert, Richard A., 2001. "Contracting theory and accounting," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 32(1-3), pages 3-87, December.
    7. Rogerson, William P, 1997. "Intertemporal Cost Allocation and Managerial Investment Incentives: A Theory Explaining the Use of Economic Value Added as a Performance Measure," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 105(4), pages 770-795, August.
    8. Martin Ellis, 2001. "Goodwill Accounting: Everything Has Changed And Nothing Has Changed," Journal of Applied Corporate Finance, Morgan Stanley, vol. 14(3), pages 103-112, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Lindblom, Ted & Sjögren, Stefan, 2009. "Increasing goal congruence in project evaluation by introducing a strict market depreciation schedule," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 121(2), pages 519-532, October.
    2. Gunther Friedl & Björn Anton, 2010. "Anforderungen an ein wertorientiertes Management Accounting in Banken," Schmalenbach Journal of Business Research, Springer, vol. 62(61), pages 83-107, January.
    3. Sunil Dutta & Stefan Reichelstein, 2003. "Leading Indicator Variables, Performance Measurement, and Long‐Term Versus Short‐Term Contracts," Journal of Accounting Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 41(5), pages 837-866, December.
    4. Christian Gaber, 2005. "Bewertung von Fertigerzeugnissen zu Volloder Teilkosten? Ansatz von Forderungen zum Nennwert oder Barwert?," Schmalenbach Journal of Business Research, Springer, vol. 57(4), pages 325-352, June.
    5. Mark Bagnoli & Susan G. Watts, 2005. "Conservative Accounting Choices," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 51(5), pages 786-801, May.
    6. Christian Hofmann, 2005. "Gestaltung von Erfolgsrechnungen zur Steuerung langfristiger Projekte," Schmalenbach Journal of Business Research, Springer, vol. 57(8), pages 689-716, December.
    7. Thomas Pfeiffer, 2006. "Zur „Doppelzählungsproblematik“ bei der Kapitalkostenbestimmung bei internem Risikoverbund und Kapitalmarktinteraktion," Schmalenbach Journal of Business Research, Springer, vol. 58(55), pages 79-108, January.
    8. Reichelstein, Stefan J. & Dutta, Sunil, 2001. "Controlling Investment Decisions: Depreciation and Capital Charges," Research Papers 1722, Stanford University, Graduate School of Business.
    9. Roychowdhury, Sugata & Shroff, Nemit & Verdi, Rodrigo S., 2019. "The effects of financial reporting and disclosure on corporate investment: A review," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 68(2).
    10. Pfaff, & Troßmann,, 2016. "Die Kosten- und Leistungsrechnung – Ein Blick auf mehr als 70 Jahre Vergangenheit und eine spannende Zukunft," Die Unternehmung - Swiss Journal of Business Research and Practice, Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG, vol. 70(4), pages 365-386.
    11. Thomas Pfeiffer, 2004. "Net Present Value‐Consistent Investment Criteria Based on Accruals: A Generalisation of the Residual Income‐Identity," Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(7‐8), pages 905-926, September.
    12. Andreas Haake, 2012. "Die Grundregeln von Herbert Hax zur Performance-Messung und die Bilanzierung von Kreditrisiken," Schmalenbach Journal of Business Research, Springer, vol. 64(1), pages 71-110, February.
    13. Robert Bushman & Ellen Engel & Abbie Smith, 2006. "An Analysis of the Relation between the Stewardship and Valuation Roles of Earnings," Journal of Accounting Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 44(1), pages 53-83, March.
    14. Tim Baldenius & Stefan Reichelstein, 2005. "Incentives for Efficient Inventory Management: The Role of Historical Cost," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 51(7), pages 1032-1045, July.
    15. Schosser, Josef, 2019. "Consistency between principal and agent with differing time horizons: Computing incentives under risk," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 277(3), pages 1113-1123.
    16. Livdan, Dmitry & Nezlobin, Alexander, 2022. "Incentivizing irreversible investment," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 110531, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    17. Stefan Dierkes, 2004. "Strategische Kostenanpassung oder relative Leistungsbewertung — Was ist besser?," Schmalenbach Journal of Business Research, Springer, vol. 56(1), pages 45-59, February.
    18. Dutta, Sunil & Reichelstein, Stefan J., 2004. "Stock Price, Earnings and Book Value in Managerial Performance Measures," Research Papers 1873, Stanford University, Graduate School of Business.
    19. Margaret A. Abernethy & Jan Bouwens & Laurence Van Lent, 2013. "The Role of Performance Measures in the Intertemporal Decisions of Business Unit Managers," Contemporary Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 30(3), pages 925-961, September.
    20. Ittner, Christopher D. & Larcker, David F., 2001. "Assessing empirical research in managerial accounting: a value-based management perspective," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 32(1-3), pages 349-410, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:metrik:v:18:y:2007:i:2:p:133-159. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.