New sufficient conditions for average optimality in continuous-time Markov decision processes
Author
Abstract
Suggested Citation
DOI: 10.1007/s00186-010-0307-4
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.
References listed on IDEAS
- Doshi, Bharat T., 1976. "Continuous time control of Markov processes on an arbitrary state space: Average return criterion," Stochastic Processes and their Applications, Elsevier, vol. 4(1), pages 55-77, January.
- Quanxin Zhu, 2007. "Average optimality inequality for continuous-time Markov decision processes in Polish spaces," Mathematical Methods of Operations Research, Springer;Gesellschaft für Operations Research (GOR);Nederlands Genootschap voor Besliskunde (NGB), vol. 66(2), pages 299-313, October.
Citations
Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
Cited by:
- Xianping Guo & Yi Zhang, 2016. "Optimality of Mixed Policies for Average Continuous-Time Markov Decision Processes with Constraints," Mathematics of Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 41(4), pages 1276-1296, November.
- Ping Cao & Jingui Xie, 2016. "Optimal control of a multiclass queueing system when customers can change types," Queueing Systems: Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 82(3), pages 285-313, April.
- Qingda Wei & Xianping Guo, 2012. "New Average Optimality Conditions for Semi-Markov Decision Processes in Borel Spaces," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 153(3), pages 709-732, June.
Most related items
These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.- Xianping Guo, 2007. "Continuous-Time Markov Decision Processes with Discounted Rewards: The Case of Polish Spaces," Mathematics of Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 32(1), pages 73-87, February.
More about this item
Keywords
Average reward criterion; Continuous-time Markov decision process; Unbounded transition and reward rates; Optimality two-inequality approach; Optimal stationary policy; 90C40; 93E20;All these keywords.
JEL classification:
Statistics
Access and download statisticsCorrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:mathme:v:72:y:2010:i:1:p:75-94. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.