Simple rules for measuring changes in ecosystem carbon in forestry-offset projects
Author
Abstract
Suggested Citation
DOI: 10.1023/A:1009692114618
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.
References listed on IDEAS
- Steven Hamburg & Dmitri Zamolodchikov & George Korovin & Viktor Nefedjev & Anatoly Utkin & Jakov Gulbe & Tatjana Gulbe, 1997. "Estimating the carbon content of russian forests; a comparison of phytomass/volume and allometric projections," Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, Springer, vol. 2(2), pages 247-265, June.
Citations
Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
Cited by:
- Wells, Geoff & Fisher, Janet A. & Porras, Ina & Staddon, Sam & Ryan, Casey, 2017. "Rethinking Monitoring in Smallholder Carbon Payments for Ecosystem Service Schemes: Devolve Monitoring, Understand Accuracy and Identify Co-benefits," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 139(C), pages 115-127.
- Oscar Cacho & Russell Wise & Kenneth MacDicken, 2004. "Carbon Monitoring Costs and their Effect on Incentives to Sequester Carbon through Forestry," Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, Springer, vol. 9(3), pages 273-293, July.
- Vardan Singh Rawat, 2013. "Carbon Sequestration Rates in Van Panchayat Forests and Their Benefits under REDD," Journal of Asian Scientific Research, Asian Economic and Social Society, vol. 3(4), pages 396-402, April.
- Timothy Capon & Michael Harris & Andrew Reeson, 2013. "The Design of Markets for Soil Carbon Sequestration," Economic Papers, The Economic Society of Australia, vol. 32(2), pages 161-173, June.
Most related items
These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.- Kenneth Andrasko, 1997. "Forest management for greenhouse gas benefits: Resolving monitoring issues across project and national boundaries," Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, Springer, vol. 2(2), pages 117-132, June.
More about this item
Keywords
aboveground living biomass; carbon accounting; forestry-offset projects; measuring ecosystem carbon; soil carbon;All these keywords.
Statistics
Access and download statisticsCorrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:masfgc:v:5:y:2000:i:1:p:25-37. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.