IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/jtrsec/v10y2017i3d10.1007_s12198-017-0184-7.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

False alarm rates of liquid explosives detection systems

Author

Listed:
  • Elitsa Dzhongova

    (European Commission, Joint Research Centre)

  • David Anderson

    (European Commission, Joint Research Centre)

  • Jaap Ruiter

    (Nederlandse Organisatie voor Toegepast Natuurwetenschappelijk Onderzoek (TNO))

  • Velibor Novakovic

    (Institute of Physics Belgrade)

  • Miguel Ruiz Oses

    (European Commission, Joint Research Centre)

Abstract

Restrictions on the carriage of liquids, aerosol, and gels (LAGs) by airline passengers have been in place since November 2006, following the discovery of a terrorist plot involving homemade liquid explosives to be used on transatlantic flights (Wikipedia, 2006). Restrictions on the carriage of LAGs remain today, and the operational impact of introducing further screening of liquids is subject to ongoing debate. This paper addresses one of the concerns, namely that the false alarm rates of liquid explosive detection systems (LEDS) are adversely affected by the filling level of LAGs containers. Our study contributes to a better understanding of the operational impact of screening partially full containers, based on a large number of screening repetitions under laboratory conditions and robust statistical analysis. False alarm rates were observed for 39 LAGs screened with 5 different LEDS. For each combination, four different container filling levels (100%, 75%, 50% and 25%) were studied. These observations were used to model the impact of partially filling for sequential combinations of equipment. Three possible scenarios were considered, namely passengers being allowed to carry (1) only water, (2) water & soft drinks, and (3) all LAGs. The results show that, for a sequential combination of two equipment types, the impact of partially filled containers on the overall false alarm rate is negligible. Nevertheless, partially filled containers do result in an approximate two-fold increase in the number of items requiring level-two screening, which may be significant for airports when managing their screening processes.

Suggested Citation

  • Elitsa Dzhongova & David Anderson & Jaap Ruiter & Velibor Novakovic & Miguel Ruiz Oses, 2017. "False alarm rates of liquid explosives detection systems," Journal of Transportation Security, Springer, vol. 10(3), pages 145-169, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:jtrsec:v:10:y:2017:i:3:d:10.1007_s12198-017-0184-7
    DOI: 10.1007/s12198-017-0184-7
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s12198-017-0184-7
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s12198-017-0184-7?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. David Anderson, 2021. "Optimising multi-layered security screening," Journal of Transportation Security, Springer, vol. 14(3), pages 249-273, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:jtrsec:v:10:y:2017:i:3:d:10.1007_s12198-017-0184-7. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.