IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/jsched/v28y2025i1d10.1007_s10951-024-00819-8.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Selection hyper-heuristics and job shop scheduling problems: How does instance size influence performance?

Author

Listed:
  • Fernando Garza-Santisteban

    (Tecnologico de Monterrey)

  • Jorge Mario Cruz-Duarte

    (Tecnologico de Monterrey)

  • Ivan Amaya

    (Tecnologico de Monterrey)

  • José Carlos Ortiz-Bayliss

    (Tecnologico de Monterrey)

  • Santiago Enrique Conant-Pablos

    (Tecnologico de Monterrey)

  • Hugo Terashima-Marín

    (Tecnologico de Monterrey)

Abstract

Selection hyper-heuristics are novel tools that combine low-level heuristics into robust solvers commonly used for tackling combinatorial optimization problems. However, the training cost is a drawback that hinders their applicability. In this work, we analyze the effect of training with different problem sizes to determine whether an effective simplification can be made. We select Job Shop Scheduling problems as an illustrative scenario to analyze and propose two hyper-heuristic approaches, based on Simulated Annealing (SA) and Unified Particle Swarm Optimization (UPSO), which use a defined set of simple priority dispatching rules as heuristics. Preliminary results suggest a relationship between instance size and hyper-heuristic performance. We conduct experiments training on two different instance sizes to understand such a relationship better. Our data show that hyper-heuristics trained in small-sized instances perform similarly to those trained in larger ones. However, the extent of such an effect changes depending on the approach followed. This effect was more substantial for the model powered by SA, and the resulting behavior for small and large-sized instances was very similar. Conversely, for the model powered by UPSO, data were more outspread. Even so, the phenomenon was noticeable as the median performance was similar between small and large-sized instances. In fact, through UPSO, we achieved hyper-heuristics that performed better on the training set. However, using small-sized instances seems to overspecialize, which results in spread-out testing performance. Hyper-heuristics resulting from training with small-sized instances can outperform a synthetic Oracle on large-sized testing instances in about 50% of the runs for SA and 25% for UPSO. This allows for significant time savings during the training procedure, thus representing a worthy approach.

Suggested Citation

  • Fernando Garza-Santisteban & Jorge Mario Cruz-Duarte & Ivan Amaya & José Carlos Ortiz-Bayliss & Santiago Enrique Conant-Pablos & Hugo Terashima-Marín, 2025. "Selection hyper-heuristics and job shop scheduling problems: How does instance size influence performance?," Journal of Scheduling, Springer, vol. 28(1), pages 85-99, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:jsched:v:28:y:2025:i:1:d:10.1007_s10951-024-00819-8
    DOI: 10.1007/s10951-024-00819-8
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10951-024-00819-8
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10951-024-00819-8?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:jsched:v:28:y:2025:i:1:d:10.1007_s10951-024-00819-8. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.