IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/joptap/v163y2014i3d10.1007_s10957-014-0551-5.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Bidding Game with Heterogeneous Players

Author

Listed:
  • Alberto Bressan

    (Penn State University)

  • Deling Wei

    (Penn State University)

Abstract

A one-sided limit order book is modeled as a noncooperative game for several players. Agents offer various quantities of an asset at different prices, competing to fulfill an incoming order, whose size is not known a priori. Players can have different payoff functions, reflecting different beliefs about the fundamental value of the asset and probability distribution of the random incoming order. In a previous paper, the existence of a Nash equilibrium was established by means of a fixed point argument. The main issue discussed in the present paper is whether this equilibrium can be obtained from the unique solution to a two-point boundary value problem, for a suitable system of discontinuous ordinary differential equations. Some additional assumptions are introduced, which yield a positive answer. In particular, this is true when there are exactly two players, or when all players assign the same exponential probability distribution to the incoming order. In both of these cases, we also prove that the Nash equilibrium is unique. A counterexample shows that these assumptions cannot be removed, in general.

Suggested Citation

  • Alberto Bressan & Deling Wei, 2014. "A Bidding Game with Heterogeneous Players," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 163(3), pages 1018-1048, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:joptap:v:163:y:2014:i:3:d:10.1007_s10957-014-0551-5
    DOI: 10.1007/s10957-014-0551-5
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10957-014-0551-5
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10957-014-0551-5?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Obizhaeva, Anna A. & Wang, Jiang, 2013. "Optimal trading strategy and supply/demand dynamics," Journal of Financial Markets, Elsevier, vol. 16(1), pages 1-32.
    2. Rama Cont & Sasha Stoikov & Rishi Talreja, 2010. "A Stochastic Model for Order Book Dynamics," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 58(3), pages 549-563, June.
    3. Ioanid Rosu, 2009. "A Dynamic Model of the Limit Order Book," Post-Print hal-00515873, HAL.
    4. Ioanid Rosu, 2009. "A Dynamic Model of the Limit Order Book," The Review of Financial Studies, Society for Financial Studies, vol. 22(11), pages 4601-4641, November.
    5. Dockner,Engelbert J. & Jorgensen,Steffen & Long,Ngo Van & Sorger,Gerhard, 2000. "Differential Games in Economics and Management Science," Cambridge Books, Cambridge University Press, number 9780521637329, October.
    6. Kerry Back & Shmuel Baruch, 2013. "Strategic Liquidity Provision in Limit Order Markets," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 81(1), pages 363-392, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Roman Gayduk & Sergey Nadtochiy, 2016. "Endogenous Formation of Limit Order Books: Dynamics Between Trades," Papers 1605.09720, arXiv.org, revised Jun 2017.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Martin D. Gould & Mason A. Porter & Stacy Williams & Mark McDonald & Daniel J. Fenn & Sam D. Howison, 2010. "Limit Order Books," Papers 1012.0349, arXiv.org, revised Apr 2013.
    2. Jin Ma & Eunjung Noh, 2020. "Equilibrium Model of Limit Order Books: A Mean-field Game View," Papers 2002.12857, arXiv.org, revised Mar 2020.
    3. Frank McGroarty & Ash Booth & Enrico Gerding & V. L. Raju Chinthalapati, 2019. "High frequency trading strategies, market fragility and price spikes: an agent based model perspective," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 282(1), pages 217-244, November.
    4. Roman Gayduk & Sergey Nadtochiy, 2016. "Endogenous Formation of Limit Order Books: Dynamics Between Trades," Papers 1605.09720, arXiv.org, revised Jun 2017.
    5. Martin D. Gould & Mason A. Porter & Stacy Williams & Mark McDonald & Daniel J. Fenn & Sam D. Howison, 2013. "Limit order books," Quantitative Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 13(11), pages 1709-1742, November.
    6. Hugh L. Christensen & Richard E. Turner & Simon I. Hill & Simon J. Godsill, 2013. "Rebuilding the limit order book: sequential Bayesian inference on hidden states," Quantitative Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 13(11), pages 1779-1799, November.
    7. Marcello Rambaldi & Emmanuel Bacry & Jean-Franc{c}ois Muzy, 2018. "Disentangling and quantifying market participant volatility contributions," Papers 1807.07036, arXiv.org.
    8. Ulrich Horst & Michael Paulsen, 2017. "A Law of Large Numbers for Limit Order Books," Mathematics of Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 42(4), pages 1280-1312, November.
    9. A. Lykov & S. Muzychka & K. Vaninsky, 2012. "Investor's sentiment in multi-agent model of the continuous double auction," Papers 1208.3083, arXiv.org, revised Feb 2016.
    10. Gerry Tsoukalas & Jiang Wang & Kay Giesecke, 2019. "Dynamic Portfolio Execution," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 67(5), pages 2015-2040, May.
    11. Weibing Huang & Charles-Albert Lehalle & Mathieu Rosenbaum, 2015. "Simulating and Analyzing Order Book Data: The Queue-Reactive Model," Journal of the American Statistical Association, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 110(509), pages 107-122, March.
    12. Dimitri Vayanos & Jiang Wang, 2012. "Market Liquidity -- Theory and Empirical Evidence," NBER Working Papers 18251, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    13. Danny Lo, 2015. "Essays in Market Microstructure and Investor Trading," PhD Thesis, Finance Discipline Group, UTS Business School, University of Technology, Sydney, number 4-2015, January-A.
    14. Jonathan A. Ch'avez-Casillas & Jos'e E. Figueroa-L'opez, 2014. "One-level limit order book models with memory and variable spread," Papers 1407.5684, arXiv.org, revised Mar 2016.
    15. Seungki Min & Costis Maglaras & Ciamac C. Moallemi, 2018. "Cross-Sectional Variation of Intraday Liquidity, Cross-Impact, and their Effect on Portfolio Execution," Papers 1811.05524, arXiv.org.
    16. Raymond P. H. Fishe & Richard Haynes & Esen Onur, 2022. "Resiliency in the E‐mini futures market," Journal of Futures Markets, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 42(1), pages 5-23, January.
    17. Alessio Emanuele Biondo, 2019. "Order book modeling and financial stability," Journal of Economic Interaction and Coordination, Springer;Society for Economic Science with Heterogeneous Interacting Agents, vol. 14(3), pages 469-489, September.
    18. Korolev, V.Yu. & Chertok, A.V. & Korchagin, A.Yu. & Zeifman, A.I., 2015. "Modeling high-frequency order flow imbalance by functional limit theorems for two-sided risk processes," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 253(C), pages 224-241.
    19. Alexander Lykov & Stepan Muzychka & Kirill Vaninsky, 2016. "Investor'S Sentiment In Multi-Agent Model Of The Continuous Double Auction," International Journal of Theoretical and Applied Finance (IJTAF), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 19(06), pages 1-29, September.
    20. Ulrich Horst & Michael Paulsen, 2015. "A law of large numbers for limit order books," Papers 1501.00843, arXiv.org.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:joptap:v:163:y:2014:i:3:d:10.1007_s10957-014-0551-5. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.