IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/joptap/v155y2012i3d10.1007_s10957-012-0103-9.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Decision Making and Optimization in Changeable Spaces, a New Paradigm

Author

Listed:
  • Moussa Larbani

    (IIUM university)

  • Po Lung Yu

    (National Chiao Tung University
    University of Kansas)

Abstract

This paper proposes a new decision making/optimization paradigm, the decision making/optimization in changeable spaces (DM/OCS). The unique feature of DM/OCS is that it incorporates human psychology and its dynamics as part of the decision making process and allows the restructuring of the decision parameters. DM/OCS is based on Habitual Domain theory, the decision parameters, the concept of competence set, and the mental operators 7-8-9 principles of deep knowledge. The covering and discovering processes are formulated as DM/OCS problems. Some illustrative examples of challenging problems that cannot be solved by traditional decision making/optimization techniques are formulated as DM/OCS problems and solved. In addition, some directions of research related to innovation dynamics, management, artificial intelligence, artificial and e-economics, scientific discovery, and knowledge extraction are provided in the conclusion.

Suggested Citation

  • Moussa Larbani & Po Lung Yu, 2012. "Decision Making and Optimization in Changeable Spaces, a New Paradigm," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 155(3), pages 727-761, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:joptap:v:155:y:2012:i:3:d:10.1007_s10957-012-0103-9
    DOI: 10.1007/s10957-012-0103-9
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10957-012-0103-9
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10957-012-0103-9?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. R. E. Bellman & L. A. Zadeh, 1970. "Decision-Making in a Fuzzy Environment," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 17(4), pages 141-164, December.
    2. Yu, Po L. & Zhang, Dazhi, 1990. "A foundation for competence set analysis," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 20(3), pages 251-299, December.
    3. Masatoshi Sakawa & Ichiro Nishizaki & Hideki Katagiri, 2011. "Fuzzy Multiobjective Stochastic Programming," International Series in Operations Research & Management Science, in: Fuzzy Stochastic Multiobjective Programming, chapter 0, pages 49-99, Springer.
    4. M. Larbani & P. L. Yu, 2009. "Two-Person Second-Order Games, Part 2: Restructuring Operations to Reach a Win-Win Profile," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 141(3), pages 641-659, June.
    5. P. L. Yu & M. Larbani, 2009. "Two-Person Second-Order Games, Part 1: Formulation and Transition Anatomy," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 141(3), pages 619-639, June.
    6. Marco Li Calzi & Lucia Milone & Paolo Pellizzari (ed.), 2010. "Progress in Artificial Economics," Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems, Springer, number 978-3-642-13947-5, July.
    7. Masatoshi Sakawa & Ichiro Nishizaki & Hideki Katagiri, 2011. "Fuzzy Stochastic Multiobjective Programming," International Series in Operations Research and Management Science, Springer, number 978-1-4419-8402-9, April.
    8. M. Larbani & P. L. Yu, 2011. "n-Person Second-Order Games: A Paradigm Shift in Game Theory," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 149(3), pages 447-473, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Moussa Larbani & Po Lung Yu, 2020. "Empowering Data Mining Sciences by Habitual Domains Theory, Part II: Reaching Wonderful Solutions," Annals of Data Science, Springer, vol. 7(4), pages 549-580, December.
    2. T. Q. Bao & B. S. Mordukhovich & A. Soubeyran, 2015. "Variational Analysis in Psychological Modeling," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 164(1), pages 290-315, January.
    3. G. C. Bento & A. Soubeyran, 2015. "Generalized Inexact Proximal Algorithms: Routine’s Formation with Resistance to Change, Following Worthwhile Changes," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 166(1), pages 172-187, July.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. T. Q. Bao & B. S. Mordukhovich & A. Soubeyran, 2015. "Variational Analysis in Psychological Modeling," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 164(1), pages 290-315, January.
    2. Po-Lung Yu & Yen-Chu Chen, 2012. "Dynamic multiple criteria decision making in changeable spaces: from habitual domains to innovation dynamics," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 197(1), pages 201-220, August.
    3. S. Dutta & B.C. Sahoo & Rajashree Mishra & S. Acharya, 2016. "Fuzzy Stochastic Genetic Algorithm for Obtaining Optimum Crops Pattern and Water Balance in a Farm," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 30(12), pages 4097-4123, September.
    4. Chi-Yo Huang & Jih-Jeng Huang & You-Ning Chang & Yen-Chu Lin, 2021. "A Fuzzy-MOP-Based Competence Set Expansion Method for Technology Roadmap Definitions," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(2), pages 1-26, January.
    5. Ngandu Balekelayi & Haile Woldesellasse & Solomon Tesfamariam, 2022. "Comparison of the Performance of a Surrogate Based Gaussian Process, NSGA2 and PSO Multi-objective Optimization of the Operation and Fuzzy Structural Reliability of Water Distribution System: Case Stu," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 36(15), pages 6169-6185, December.
    6. M. Sakawa & T. Matsui & H. Katagiri, 2013. "An interactive fuzzy satisficing method for random fuzzy multiobjective integer programming problems through probability maximization with possibility," Fuzzy Information and Engineering, Springer, vol. 5(3), pages 335-350, September.
    7. M. Larbani & P. L. Yu, 2011. "n-Person Second-Order Games: A Paradigm Shift in Game Theory," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 149(3), pages 447-473, June.
    8. Vuciterna, Rina & Thomsen, Michael & Popp, Jennie & Musliu, Arben, 2017. "Efficiency and Competitiveness of Kosovo Raspberry Producers," 2017 Annual Meeting, February 4-7, 2017, Mobile, Alabama 252770, Southern Agricultural Economics Association.
    9. Collan, Mikael, 2008. "New Method for Real Option Valuation Using Fuzzy Numbers," Working Papers 466, IAMSR, Åbo Akademi.
    10. Wenyao Niu & Yuan Rong & Liying Yu & Lu Huang, 2022. "A Novel Hybrid Group Decision Making Approach Based on EDAS and Regret Theory under a Fermatean Cubic Fuzzy Environment," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(17), pages 1-30, August.
    11. de Andres-Sanchez, Jorge, 2007. "Claim reserving with fuzzy regression and Taylor's geometric separation method," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 40(1), pages 145-163, January.
    12. Mikhailov, L., 2004. "A fuzzy approach to deriving priorities from interval pairwise comparison judgements," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 159(3), pages 687-704, December.
    13. Hongyi Sun & Bingqian Zhang & Wenbin Ni, 2022. "A Hybrid Model Based on SEM and Fuzzy TOPSIS for Supplier Selection," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(19), pages 1-19, September.
    14. Liu, Yong-Jun & Zhang, Wei-Guo, 2015. "A multi-period fuzzy portfolio optimization model with minimum transaction lots," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 242(3), pages 933-941.
    15. Sakawa, Masatoshi & Kato, Kosuke, 1998. "An interactive fuzzy satisficing method for structured multiobjective linear fractional programs with fuzzy numbers," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 107(3), pages 575-589, June.
    16. Sajid Ali & Sang-Moon Lee & Choon-Man Jang, 2017. "Determination of the Most Optimal On-Shore Wind Farm Site Location Using a GIS-MCDM Methodology: Evaluating the Case of South Korea," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-22, December.
    17. Bogdana Stanojević & Milan Stanojević & Sorin Nădăban, 2021. "Reinstatement of the Extension Principle in Approaching Mathematical Programming with Fuzzy Numbers," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(11), pages 1-16, June.
    18. Svajone Bekesiene & Serhii Mashchenko, 2023. "On Nash Equilibria in a Finite Game for Fuzzy Sets of Strategies," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(22), pages 1-12, November.
    19. Qian-Yun Tan & Cui-Ping Wei & Qi Liu & Xiang-Qian Feng, 2016. "The Hesitant Fuzzy Linguistic TOPSIS Method Based on Novel Information Measures," Asia-Pacific Journal of Operational Research (APJOR), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 33(05), pages 1-22, October.
    20. Serafim Opricovic, 2009. "A Compromise Solution in Water Resources Planning," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 23(8), pages 1549-1561, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:joptap:v:155:y:2012:i:3:d:10.1007_s10957-012-0103-9. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.