IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/joptap/v144y2010i1d10.1007_s10957-009-9593-5.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Average Flow Constraints and Stabilizability in Uncertain Production-Distribution Systems

Author

Listed:
  • D. Bauso

    (Università di Palermo)

  • F. Blanchini

    (Università di Udine)

  • R. Pesenti

    (Università “Ca’ Foscari” di Venezia)

Abstract

We consider a multi-inventory system with controlled flows and uncertain demands (disturbances) bounded within assigned compact sets. The system is modelled as a first-order one integrating the discrepancy between controlled flows and demands at different sites/nodes. Thus, the buffer levels at the nodes represent the system state. Given a long-term average demand, we are interested in a control strategy that satisfies just one of two requirements: (i) meeting any possible demand at each time (worst case stability) or (ii) achieving a predefined flow in the average (average flow constraints). Necessary and sufficient conditions for the achievement of both goals have been proposed by the authors. In this paper, we face the case in which these conditions are not satisfied. We show that, if we ignore the requirement on worst case stability, we can find a control strategy driving the expected value of the state to zero. On the contrary, if we ignore the average flow constraints, we can find a control strategy that satisfies worst case stability while optimizing any linear cost on the average control. In the latter case, we provide a tight bound for the cost.

Suggested Citation

  • D. Bauso & F. Blanchini & R. Pesenti, 2010. "Average Flow Constraints and Stabilizability in Uncertain Production-Distribution Systems," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 144(1), pages 12-28, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:joptap:v:144:y:2010:i:1:d:10.1007_s10957-009-9593-5
    DOI: 10.1007/s10957-009-9593-5
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10957-009-9593-5
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10957-009-9593-5?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Alan L. Erera & Juan C. Morales & Martin Savelsbergh, 2009. "Robust Optimization for Empty Repositioning Problems," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 57(2), pages 468-483, April.
    2. Lou, S. & Sethi, S. P. & Zhang, Q., 1994. "Optimal feedback production planning in a stochastic two-machine flowshop," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 73(2), pages 331-345, March.
    3. Dimitris Bertsimas & Aurélie Thiele, 2006. "A Robust Optimization Approach to Inventory Theory," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 54(1), pages 150-168, February.
    4. Alper Atamtürk & Muhong Zhang, 2007. "Two-Stage Robust Network Flow and Design Under Demand Uncertainty," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 55(4), pages 662-673, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Alan L. Erera & Juan C. Morales & Martin Savelsbergh, 2009. "Robust Optimization for Empty Repositioning Problems," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 57(2), pages 468-483, April.
    2. Varas, Mauricio & Maturana, Sergio & Pascual, Rodrigo & Vargas, Ignacio & Vera, Jorge, 2014. "Scheduling production for a sawmill: A robust optimization approach," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 150(C), pages 37-51.
    3. Shahparvari, Shahrooz & Abbasi, Babak, 2017. "Robust stochastic vehicle routing and scheduling for bushfire emergency evacuation: An Australian case study," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 104(C), pages 32-49.
    4. Jia Shu & Miao Song, 2014. "Dynamic Container Deployment: Two-Stage Robust Model, Complexity, and Computational Results," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 26(1), pages 135-149, February.
    5. Agostinho Agra & Marielle Christiansen & Lars Magnus Hvattum & Filipe Rodrigues, 2018. "Robust Optimization for a Maritime Inventory Routing Problem," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 52(3), pages 509-525, June.
    6. Selin Damla Ahipaşaoğlu & Uğur Arıkan & Karthik Natarajan, 2019. "Distributionally Robust Markovian Traffic Equilibrium," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 53(6), pages 1546-1562, November.
    7. Wang, Zujian & Qi, Mingyao, 2019. "Service network design considering multiple types of services," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 126(C), pages 1-14.
    8. Fernando Ordóñez & Nicolás E. Stier-Moses, 2010. "Wardrop Equilibria with Risk-Averse Users," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 44(1), pages 63-86, February.
    9. Oğuz Solyalı & Jean-François Cordeau & Gilbert Laporte, 2016. "The Impact of Modeling on Robust Inventory Management Under Demand Uncertainty," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 62(4), pages 1188-1201, April.
    10. Marcus Ang & Yun Fong Lim & Melvyn Sim, 2012. "Robust Storage Assignment in Unit-Load Warehouses," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 58(11), pages 2114-2130, November.
    11. Marla, Lavanya & Rikun, Alexander & Stauffer, Gautier & Pratsini, Eleni, 2020. "Robust modeling and planning: Insights from three industrial applications," Operations Research Perspectives, Elsevier, vol. 7(C).
    12. Dario Bauso & Ehud Lehrer & Eilon Solan & Xavier Venel, 2015. "Attainability in Repeated Games with Vector Payoffs," Mathematics of Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 40(3), pages 739-755, March.
    13. Mengshi Lu & Zuo‐Jun Max Shen, 2021. "A Review of Robust Operations Management under Model Uncertainty," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 30(6), pages 1927-1943, June.
    14. Ben-Tal, Aharon & Chung, Byung Do & Mandala, Supreet Reddy & Yao, Tao, 2011. "Robust optimization for emergency logistics planning: Risk mitigation in humanitarian relief supply chains," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 45(8), pages 1177-1189, September.
    15. Juan S. Borrero & Leonardo Lozano, 2021. "Modeling Defender-Attacker Problems as Robust Linear Programs with Mixed-Integer Uncertainty Sets," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 33(4), pages 1570-1589, October.
    16. Sarhadi, Hassan & Naoum-Sawaya, Joe & Verma, Manish, 2020. "A robust optimization approach to locating and stockpiling marine oil-spill response facilities," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 141(C).
    17. Serrano, Breno & Minner, Stefan & Schiffer, Maximilian & Vidal, Thibaut, 2024. "Bilevel optimization for feature selection in the data-driven newsvendor problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 315(2), pages 703-714.
    18. Qiu, Ruozhen & Sun, Minghe & Lim, Yun Fong, 2017. "Optimizing (s, S) policies for multi-period inventory models with demand distribution uncertainty: Robust dynamic programing approaches," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 261(3), pages 880-892.
    19. David Simchi-Levi & Nikolaos Trichakis & Peter Yun Zhang, 2019. "Designing Response Supply Chain Against Bioattacks," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 67(5), pages 1246-1268, September.
    20. Antonio G. Martín & Manuel Díaz-Madroñero & Josefa Mula, 2020. "Master production schedule using robust optimization approaches in an automobile second-tier supplier," Central European Journal of Operations Research, Springer;Slovak Society for Operations Research;Hungarian Operational Research Society;Czech Society for Operations Research;Österr. Gesellschaft für Operations Research (ÖGOR);Slovenian Society Informatika - Section for Operational Research;Croatian Operational Research Society, vol. 28(1), pages 143-166, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:joptap:v:144:y:2010:i:1:d:10.1007_s10957-009-9593-5. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.